With much less fanfare than the last time, here is a minor release of the Instiki 0.10 version. Although there are no new features to speak of, if you are playing it safe and still holding on to version 0.9 or earlier, now is the time to consider an upgrade. Instiki 0.10.1 is certainly better (less bugs, more usability) than what you have. Thanks to all the adventurous souls who upgraded to 0.10.0 and provided bug reports and patches included in this new version. Changes: * Upgraded Rails to 0.12.0 * Upgraded rubyzip to version 0.5.8 * BlueCloth is back (RedCloth didn''t do pure Markdown well enough) * Handling of line breaks in Textile is as in 0.9 (inserts <br/> tag) * Fixed HTML export (to enclose the output in <html> tags, include the stylesheet etc) * Corrected some compatibility issues with storages from earlier Instiki versions * Some other bug fixes Upgrade instructions: 1. Shut down Instiki. 2. Backup your storage directory. 3. If you are running instiki as gem, "gem update instiki". 4. Otherwise, download the new version and unpack to a new directory. 5. If necessary, copy your storage directory to a new location and update your startup scripts accordingly. Instiki links: * Home page: http://instiki.org * Download: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=186 * Bug tracker and source browser: http://dev.instiki.org * Subversion repository: http://svn.instiki.org/instiki * Instiki-users maillist: instiki-users@rubyforge.org -- Best regards, Alexey Verkhovsky Ruby Forum: http://ruby-forum.org (moderator) RForum: http://rforum.andreas-s.net (co-author) Instiki: http://instiki.org (maintainer)
With much less fanfare than the last time, here is a minor release of the Instiki 0.10 version. Although there are no new features to speak of, if you are playing it safe and still holding on to version 0.9 or earlier, now is the time to consider an upgrade. Instiki 0.10.1 is certainly better (less bugs, more usability) than what you have. Thanks to all the adventurous souls who upgraded to 0.10.0 and provided bug reports and patches included in this new version. Changes: * Upgraded Rails to 0.12.0 * Upgraded rubyzip to version 0.5.8 * BlueCloth is back (RedCloth didn''t do pure Markdown well enough) * Handling of line breaks in Textile is as in 0.9 (inserts <br/> tag) * Fixed HTML export (to enclose the output in <html> tags, include the stylesheet etc) * Corrected some compatibility issues with storages from earlier Instiki versions * Some other bug fixes Upgrade instructions: 1. Shut down Instiki. 2. Backup your storage directory. 3. If you are running instiki as gem, "gem update instiki". 4. Otherwise, download the new version and unpack to a new directory. 5. If necessary, copy your storage directory to a new location and update your startup scripts accordingly. Instiki links: * Home page: http://instiki.org * Download: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=186 * Bug tracker and source browser: http://dev.instiki.org * Subversion repository: http://svn.instiki.org/instiki * Instiki-users maillist: instiki-users-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org -- Best regards, Alexey Verkhovsky Ruby Forum: http://ruby-forum.org (moderator) RForum: http://rforum.andreas-s.net (co-author) Instiki: http://instiki.org (maintainer)
First of all thanks for the bug fixes and a wonderful product in general.> * Fixed HTML export (to enclose the output in <html> tags, include the > stylesheet etc)Couple of things: 1) Does anyone else have a problem with the html export showing the wrong pages. i.e. the exported HomePage is showing the correct title but contents from a different page. So are all other exported pages. Maybe something date related as the homepage export is showing a new page I created last night just before upgrading. The running instiki shows the correct page contents however. 2) Is it possible to have an option to export just the page contents as with 0.10 version. This was very useful when the exported pages were run through a script to change the style sheet and other formatting to make it more usable as a stand alone document for my users. Regards Huw
Huw wrote:>First of all thanks for the bug fixes and a wonderful product in general. > > > >>* Fixed HTML export (to enclose the output in <html> tags, include the >>stylesheet etc) >> >> > > >Couple of things: > >1) Does anyone else have a problem with the html export showing the >wrong pages. i.e. the exported HomePage is showing the correct title >but contents from a different page. So are all other exported pages. >Maybe something date related as the homepage export is showing a new >page I created last night just before upgrading. > >Yeah, I have the same problem. So much for fixing things in the last minute before release, and bypassing unit tests because it is too hard. Sigh... lesson learned. I''ll fix it.>2) Is it possible to have an option to export just the page contents >as with 0.10 version. >Ah, so it was a feature! :) OK, check out SVN revision 254, and use it like http://localhost:2500/wiki/export_html?layout=no -- Best regards, Alexey Verkhovsky Ruby Forum: http://ruby-forum.org (moderator) RForum: http://rforum.andreas-s.net (co-author) Instiki: http://instiki.org (maintainer)
Blast, gmail sent direct and not to the list, sorry about that ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Huw <huw.nichols@gmail.com> Date: May 3, 2005 1:48 PM Subject: Re: [Instiki] [ANN] Instiki 0.10.1 - The Safe Option To: Alexey Verkhovsky <alex@verk.info>> >Couple of things: > > > >1) Does anyone else have a problem with the html export showing the > >wrong pages. i.e. the exported HomePage is showing the correct title > >but contents from a different page. So are all other exported pages. > >Maybe something date related as the homepage export is showing a new > >page I created last night just before upgrading. > > > > > Yeah, I have the same problem. So much for fixing things in the last > minute before release, and bypassing unit tests because it is too hard. > Sigh... lesson learned. I''ll fix it.I know what you mean :)> >2) Is it possible to have an option to export just the page contents > >as with 0.10 version. > > > Ah, so it was a feature! :)Well I found it very useful anyway, strange at first but after I started to use it that way it actually makes life easier for me> OK, check out SVN revision 254, and use it like > http://localhost:2500/wiki/export_html?layout=noThanks, I will do. Is the "layout=no" going to stay an option from now on then ? Regards Huw
Huw wrote:>Thanks, I will do. Is the "layout=no" going to stay an option from now on then ? > >Yes. -- Best regards, Alexey Verkhovsky Ruby Forum: http://ruby-forum.org (moderator) RForum: http://rforum.andreas-s.net (co-author) Instiki: http://instiki.org (maintainer)