Rails core - Apr 2008 - activerecord-sqlserver-adapter v1.0.0 missing from http://gems.rubyonrails.org

The activerecord-sqlserver-adapter gem version 1.0.0 no longer appears
to be on the gems.rubyonrails.org server. I did  a gem list and no
version 1.0.0 adapter gems are present.

The gem version 1.0.0.9216 is listed but it has a dependency rails
gems version 2.0.2.9216.

Any chance we can have the old gems back?

Thanks,
Adam.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Adam Meehan <adam.meehan@gmail.com>
wrote:
>  Any chance we can have the old gems back?
Yes, we notice you deleted Rails 1.99.0, too.  Were these deleted on
purpose or accidentally?  If on purpose, why?  Projects that don''t
want to freeze Rails may still reference them (we are waiting on a
release with a fixed Test::Unit), or might be dormant with an
(unfrozen) reference to a beta gem version.  Space can''t be an issue,
so I can''t see why publicly published artifacts (that could have even
been referenced in Rails blog posts) should go away.  You could even
stick them on rubyforge if you don''t want to maintain them, if a
higher version is already out it should not matter.  Yes, we can (and
do) run our own gem server, but not everyone does.

-- Chad

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Well I managed to find the google group for the sqlserver adapter so I
will post there too.

http://groups.google.com/group/rails-sqlserver-adapter/

Adam

On Apr 16, 6:44 pm, "Chad Woolley" <thewoolley...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Adam Meehan <adam.mee...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >  Any chance we can have the old gems back?
>
> Yes, we notice you deleted Rails 1.99.0, too.  Were these deleted on
> purpose or accidentally?  If on purpose, why?  Projects that don''t
> want to freeze Rails may still reference them (we are waiting on a
> release with a fixed Test::Unit), or might be dormant with an
> (unfrozen) reference to a beta gem version.  Space can''t be an
issue,
> so I can''t see why publicly published artifacts (that could have
even
> been referenced in Rails blog posts) should go away.  You could even
> stick them on rubyforge if you don''t want to maintain them, if a
> higher version is already out it should not matter.  Yes, we can (and
> do) run our own gem server, but not everyone does.
>
> -- Chad
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---