Adam Meehan
2008-Apr-16 05:36 UTC
activerecord-sqlserver-adapter v1.0.0 missing from http://gems.rubyonrails.org
The activerecord-sqlserver-adapter gem version 1.0.0 no longer appears to be on the gems.rubyonrails.org server. I did a gem list and no version 1.0.0 adapter gems are present. The gem version 1.0.0.9216 is listed but it has a dependency rails gems version 2.0.2.9216. Any chance we can have the old gems back? Thanks, Adam. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Chad Woolley
2008-Apr-16 08:44 UTC
Re: activerecord-sqlserver-adapter v1.0.0 missing from http://gems.rubyonrails.org
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Adam Meehan <adam.meehan@gmail.com> wrote:> Any chance we can have the old gems back?Yes, we notice you deleted Rails 1.99.0, too. Were these deleted on purpose or accidentally? If on purpose, why? Projects that don''t want to freeze Rails may still reference them (we are waiting on a release with a fixed Test::Unit), or might be dormant with an (unfrozen) reference to a beta gem version. Space can''t be an issue, so I can''t see why publicly published artifacts (that could have even been referenced in Rails blog posts) should go away. You could even stick them on rubyforge if you don''t want to maintain them, if a higher version is already out it should not matter. Yes, we can (and do) run our own gem server, but not everyone does. -- Chad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Adam Meehan
2008-Apr-17 06:57 UTC
Re: activerecord-sqlserver-adapter v1.0.0 missing from http://gems.rubyonrails.org
Well I managed to find the google group for the sqlserver adapter so I will post there too. http://groups.google.com/group/rails-sqlserver-adapter/ Adam On Apr 16, 6:44 pm, "Chad Woolley" <thewoolley...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Adam Meehan <adam.mee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Any chance we can have the old gems back? > > Yes, we notice you deleted Rails 1.99.0, too. Were these deleted on > purpose or accidentally? If on purpose, why? Projects that don''t > want to freeze Rails may still reference them (we are waiting on a > release with a fixed Test::Unit), or might be dormant with an > (unfrozen) reference to a beta gem version. Space can''t be an issue, > so I can''t see why publicly published artifacts (that could have even > been referenced in Rails blog posts) should go away. You could even > stick them on rubyforge if you don''t want to maintain them, if a > higher version is already out it should not matter. Yes, we can (and > do) run our own gem server, but not everyone does. > > -- Chad--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---