Juan Telleria
2017-Oct-29 20:42 UTC
[Rd] Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?
Dear R Developers, First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will benefit a lot from his work. However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance: https://mran.microsoft.com/documents/rro/multithread/ Maybe, the R Consortium, and in particular, Microsoft R Team, could collaborate, if appropriate, in such duty. Thank you, Juan Telleria [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Kenny Bell
2017-Oct-29 22:01 UTC
[Rd] Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?
User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO does, would be a very welcome addition. I was an MRO user before and it improved my experience with medium data immensely. They did, however, leave behind bugs here and there, especially related to development with Rcpp, so I switched back to vanilla R. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017, 9:42 AM Juan Telleria <jtelleriar at gmail.com> wrote:> Dear R Developers, > > First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary > Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will > benefit a lot from his work. > > However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R > Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. > > There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance: > https://mran.microsoft.com/documents/rro/multithread/ > > Maybe, the R Consortium, and in particular, Microsoft R Team, could > collaborate, if appropriate, in such duty. > > Thank you, > Juan Telleria > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Dirk Eddelbuettel
2017-Oct-30 03:09 UTC
[Rd] Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?
On 29 October 2017 at 22:01, Kenny Bell wrote: | User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO does, would be a very welcome | addition. | | I was an MRO user before and it improved my experience with medium data | immensely. | | They did, however, leave behind bugs here and there, especially related to | development with Rcpp, so I switched back to vanilla R. With all due respect: You may miss something. MKL has always worked with 'Base R'. As a point of reference and comparison, I set up a benchmarking and comparison package _well over half a decade ago_ and while it never get fully finished to the point of a submitted paper the vignette still stands---and demonstrates that _dropping in MKL is a one-line operation_. And always has been. There may have been some license arbitrage: Intel was an early investor in Revo, so MKL was pushed hard. With GotoBLAS and later OpenBLAS I cared less, but IIRC the license of MKL is a little simpler for "mere use" now. See https://cloud.r-project.org/web/packages/gcbd/vignettes/gcbd.pdf for more. Hth, Dirk | | On Mon, Oct 30, 2017, 9:42 AM Juan Telleria <jtelleriar at gmail.com> wrote: | | > Dear R Developers, | > | > First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary | > Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will | > benefit a lot from his work. | > | > However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R | > Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. | > | > There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance: | > https://mran.microsoft.com/documents/rro/multithread/ | > | > Maybe, the R Consortium, and in particular, Microsoft R Team, could | > collaborate, if appropriate, in such duty. | > | > Thank you, | > Juan Telleria | > | > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] | > | > ______________________________________________ | > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list | > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel | > | | [[alternative HTML version deleted]] | | ______________________________________________ | R-devel at r-project.org mailing list | https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
Avraham Adler
2017-Oct-30 17:45 UTC
[Rd] Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?
[Sent offlist accidentally] What concerns me first and foremost is that the licensure would have to be ironclad (including for commercial use like vanilla R now) as well as ensuring that R remains completely FLOSS. Anything ?added? to R has to be a no-strings-attached gift to R. Also, I would think that it would have to play nice with existing workflows (like OpenBLAS instead of MKL) unless there is such a benefit that it is worth breaking compatibility. Avi On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Kenny Bell <kmbell56 at gmail.com> wrote:> User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO does, would be a very welcome > addition. > > I was an MRO user before and it improved my experience with medium data > immensely. > > They did, however, leave behind bugs here and there, especially related to > development with Rcpp, so I switched back to vanilla R. > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017, 9:42 AM Juan Telleria <jtelleriar at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear R Developers, >> >> First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary >> Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will >> benefit a lot from his work. >> >> However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R >> Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. >> >> There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance: >> https://mran.microsoft.com/documents/rro/multithread/ >> >> Maybe, the R Consortium, and in particular, Microsoft R Team, could >> collaborate, if appropriate, in such duty. >> >> Thank you, >> Juan Telleria >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Reasonably Related Threads
- Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?
- Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?
- Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?
- Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?
- Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?