search for: debat

...23:59 GMT along with an full explaination. Said person should also specify a time Wednesday to discuss it on IRC either before or after Xiph's monthly meeting. This is not to say that such changes cannot be reverted. libogg2 is not released yet and there will be pleanty of time for more debate for those who are interested in debating the nuts and bolts. However, this *WILL* represent the direction and basis for development to continue toward the goal of getting a public release, so if you have an objection, it would be appreciated to state it now. Again, discussion should continue...

...23:59 GMT along with an full explaination. Said person should also specify a time Wednesday to discuss it on IRC either before or after Xiph's monthly meeting. This is not to say that such changes cannot be reverted. libogg2 is not released yet and there will be pleanty of time for more debate for those who are interested in debating the nuts and bolts. However, this *WILL* represent the direction and basis for development to continue toward the goal of getting a public release, so if you have an objection, it would be appreciated to state it now. Again, discussion should continue...

...23:59 GMT along with an full explaination. Said person should also specify a time Wednesday to discuss it on IRC either before or after Xiph's monthly meeting. This is not to say that such changes cannot be reverted. libogg2 is not released yet and there will be pleanty of time for more debate for those who are interested in debating the nuts and bolts. However, this *WILL* represent the direction and basis for development to continue toward the goal of getting a public release, so if you have an objection, it would be appreciated to state it now. Again, discussion should continue...

...23:59 GMT along with an full explaination. Said person should also specify a time Wednesday to discuss it on IRC either before or after Xiph's monthly meeting. This is not to say that such changes cannot be reverted. libogg2 is not released yet and there will be pleanty of time for more debate for those who are interested in debating the nuts and bolts. However, this *WILL* represent the direction and basis for development to continue toward the goal of getting a public release, so if you have an objection, it would be appreciated to state it now. Again, discussion should continue...

...23:59 GMT along with an full explaination. Said person should also specify a time Wednesday to discuss it on IRC either before or after Xiph's monthly meeting. This is not to say that such changes cannot be reverted. libogg2 is not released yet and there will be pleanty of time for more debate for those who are interested in debating the nuts and bolts. However, this *WILL* represent the direction and basis for development to continue toward the goal of getting a public release, so if you have an objection, it would be appreciated to state it now. Again, discussion should continue...

I'm looking for a solution to provide a live stream of the debate on Sofware Patents in Monday's EU Council of Ministers [1]. Here's what I've in mind: * Council --> mobile phone --> software answering machine --> Internet server * Council --> mobile phone --> VOIP --> Internet server Has anyone ever streamed something via a c...

I'm just a causual reader of the vorbis@xiph.org list and lately its been flooded with this tagging debate(and the what, 5 threads its spawned?). I think that it is getting way out of hand. I personally don't have anything against the proposal(though i'm not for it) but lately I've been getting double the number of messages I usually do and its really starting to tick me off. I'...

Currently there is a mixture of indented namespaces and un-indented namespaces in both LLVM and Clang. I think this is confusing and it wastes developer time debating the issue. I'd like to pick one and stick with it consistently. Indenting cannot possibly work in many contexts -- file-wide namespaces just make no sense to indent. So I don't think we should pick "always indent". The common pattern to indent is when there is a small body of...

...the code I already have and get it looping through quickly. (The R-squared is the last thing that is holding me up for finishing my results section). Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Regards Surrey :) -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-Square-Help-this-debate-again-i-know-tp3316844p3316844.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear R Developers, First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will benefit a lot from his work. However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance: https://mran.microsoft.com/documents/rro/multithread/ Maybe, the R Consortium, and in particular, Microsoft R Team, co...

...Solely to mbox. In fact, I even said that stuff that talks to maildir, in addition to Cyrus, offered the one thing for IMAP you could not get with mbox until Dovecot came along; something resembling robust dealing with multiple clients to the same mbox store. Nor am I particularly insterested in debating the merits of any format over mbox, a format I have stated I -KNOW- has annoying technical limitations and issues. While I would imagine other formats may have advantages over mbox, I continue to use mbox simply because of the sheer amount of stored mail I have accumulated on all my machines fo...

Hello all, Quick question (possibly!) - I''ve got a few records indexed and doing a search for ''test'' reports in no hits even though I know the word ''tests'' exists in the indexed field. Doing a search for ''tests'' produces a result. I would have thought that ''test'' would match ''tests'' but no such

...42 AM Juan Telleria <jtelleriar at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear R Developers, > > First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary > Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will > benefit a lot from his work. > > However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R > Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. > > There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance: > https://mran.microsoft.com/documents/rro/multithread/ > > Maybe, the R Consortium, and in part...

...;> Dear R Developers, > >> > >> First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the > binary > >> Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will > >> benefit a lot from his work. > >> > >> However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R > >> Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. > >> > >> There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance: > >> https://mran.microsoft.com/documents/rro/multithread/ > >&...

...ar at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear R Developers, >> >> First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary >> Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will >> benefit a lot from his work. >> >> However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R >> Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. >> >> There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance: >> https://mran.microsoft.com/documents/rro/multithread/ >> >> Maybe, the R...

...ria <jtelleriar at gmail.com> wrote: | | > Dear R Developers, | > | > First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary | > Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will | > benefit a lot from his work. | > | > However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R | > Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. | > | > There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance: | > https://mran.microsoft.com/documents/rro/multithread/ | > | > Maybe, the R Consortium,...

..., pero en Argentina si desea puede hacer un registro de su propiedad, pero solo sirve en Argentina. Javier Rubén Marcuzzi De: miguel.angel.rodriguez.muinos en sergas.es Enviado: viernes, 17 de marzo de 2017 7:27 Para: fjroar en hotmail.com; r-help-es en r-project.org Asunto: Re: [R-es] Pregunta (debate) sobre licencia R Efectivamente, la protección y cobertura legal, frente al incumplimiento de la licencia, es la misma independientemente del tipo elegido para la obra. En caso de conflicto o incumplimiento, la última palabra la tienen las autoridades competentes. Tampoco es necesario registrar...

Guys. Im reading a lot about ser, nat, stun, etc. And I noticed there are a lot of ways to get around nat but I would like to hear some success stories about handling nat users with multiple voip phones behind nat. I have my asterisk box behind but ports are forwarded (5060 5004 10000-20000 for rtp and 4569 for iax2) but still.. I can quite figure out what ser and stund have to do on this

...sion of legal issues >> around llvm/clang, which are not on-topic for this list. >> If ya'll want to have a private discussion about it, go ahead. >> But don't do it here. >> > > No, I was asking for a reference, not legal advice. If it turns into a > legal debate, *then* it's off topic. If I have to start a private > conversation for every piece of information I want, what is the point of > community conversations like these? > It is, indeed, off topic. Danny is completely correct here. The fact is that legal speculation, information, refer...

On 28 Nov 2012, at 17:02, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> 14116 - Inliner incorrectly combines cleanup and catch landing pads > > I think this one can be moved out as a release blocker. Too much debate and no action on the bug in over a month. This bug means that we can't compile at anything over -O1, or we get code that does the wrong thing (e.g. terminate instead of catching an exception) if a function with a cleanup is inlined into one with a catch (or possibly the other way around). I...