> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-devel-bounces at r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Bengtsson
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 5:45 PM
> To: R-devel
> Subject: [Rd] x[c()] <- value sets the mode to mode(value)
>
> Only for the record,
>
> an unnecessary overhead when nothing is assigned:
>
> > x <- integer(10)
> > str(x)
> int [1:10] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> > x[c()] <- 1.0;
> > str(x)
> num [1:10] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>
> 'x' could equally well have renamed untouched.
I disagree. I think the language is more predictable,
hence easier to use, if the class of the output of a
function depends only on the classes of the inputs,
not on the classes and lengths of the inputs.
Bill Dunlap
Spotfire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
>
> /Henrik
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>