Hello everyone
I am finding complex numbers to be printed oddly in R-alpha.
> 1e100+1e100i
[1] 1e+100+1e+100i
> 1e100 + 1e44i
[1] 1e+100+100000000000000008821361405306422640701865984i
> dput(1e100+1e44i)
1e+100+100000000000000008821361405306422640701865984i
>
[same thing at home on a linux box]
The first line is what I would expect, the second and third lines
aren't:
I would prefer "1e100+1e44i". Is this possible for R-2.4.0?
best wishes
rksh
> R.version
_
platform powerpc-apple-darwin8.7.0
arch powerpc
os darwin8.7.0
system powerpc, darwin8.7.0
status alpha
major 2
minor 4.0
year 2006
month 09
day 15
svn rev 39323
language R
version.string R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-15 r39323)
--
Robin Hankin
Uncertainty Analyst
National Oceanography Centre, Southampton
European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
tel 023-8059-7743
>>>>> "Robin" == Robin Hankin <r.hankin at noc.soton.ac.uk> >>>>> on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:05:24 +0100 writes:Robin> Hello everyone Robin> I am finding complex numbers to be printed oddly in R-alpha. >> 1e100+1e100i Robin> [1] 1e+100+1e+100i >> 1e100 + 1e44i Robin> [1] 1e+100+100000000000000008821361405306422640701865984i >> dput(1e100+1e44i) Robin> 1e+100+100000000000000008821361405306422640701865984i >> ouch, ouch! Robin> [same thing at home on a linux box] Robin> The first line is what I would expect, the second and third lines Robin> aren't: Robin> I would prefer "1e100+1e44i". Is this possible for R-2.4.0? It should. It's clearly a bug --- the good news being that it's not a new one: it already happens in 2.2.1 (e.g.) Hence, no reason *not* to use R-beta! Martin