Gordon Smyth <smyth@wehi.edu.au> writes:
> This is just a suggestion/wish that it would be nice for the
> F-distribution functions to recognize limiting cases for infinite
> degrees of freedom, as the t-distribution functions already do.
>
> The t-distribution functions recognize that df=Inf is equivalent to
> the standard normal distribution:
>
> > pt(1,df=Inf)
> [1] 0.8413447
> > pnorm(1)
> [1] 0.8413447
>
> On the other hand, pf() will accept Inf for df1, but returns the wrong
result:
>
> > pf(1,df1=Inf,df2=1)
> [1] 1
>
> whereas the correct limiting value is
>
> > pchisq(1,df=1,lower.tail=FALSE)
> [1] 0.3173105
>
> pf() returns NaN when df2=Inf:
>
> > pf(1,df1=1,df2=Inf)
> [1] NaN
> Warning message:
> NaNs produced in: pf(q, df1, df2, lower.tail, log.p)
>
> although the correct value is available as
>
> > pchisq(1,df=1)
> [1] 0.6826895
>
>
> Gordon
>
> > version
> _
> platform i386-pc-mingw32
> arch i386
> os mingw32
> system i386, mingw32
> status
> major 2
> minor 1.0
> year 2005
> month 04
> day 18
> language R
This is actually a regression. It worked as you suggest in 2.0.1, at
least on Linux. Also, somewhat disturbing,
> pf(1,df1=1,df2=Inf)
[1] NaN
Warning message:
NaNs produced in: pf(q, df1, df2, lower.tail, log.p)> pf(1,df1=1,df2=99999999)
[1] 0.6826895> pf(1,df1=1,df2=999999999999)
[1] 0.6826841> pf(1,df1=1,df2=99999999999999999999)
[1] 0
(notice that the middle case has actually begun to diverge from the
limiting value)
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907