In R 1.5.0 (and earlier): > print function (x, ...) UseMethod("print") > summary function (object, ...) UseMethod("summary") Is there a reason for this inconsistency in the name of the object? It makes a single help file for both functions look ugly, because it has to document both "x" and "object", which are really the same thing. Duncan Murdoch -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
2002-May-07 20:04 UTC
[Rd] Generic/method consistency in print and summary
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Duncan Murdoch wrote:> In R 1.5.0 (and earlier): > > > print > function (x, ...) > UseMethod("print") > > summary > function (object, ...) > UseMethod("summary") > > Is there a reason for this inconsistency in the name of the object?Long-term S compatibility. It's been like that since at least 1991.> It makes a single help file for both functions look ugly, because it > has to document both "x" and "object", which are really the same > thing.\item{x, object} .... -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._