search for: summary

Dear R-Helpers, I suspect I'm about to ask a FAQ, but I haven't been able to find an answer in the FAQ, AItR or an R Site Search. When I look at the methods of summary (below) it says, "Non-visible functions are asterisked". I looked at the help file for summary.princomp, which did not comment on it being non-visible. I ran its help file example, which printed visible output. I did not notice how it differed from other functions, like summary.data.frame...

Hi everyone, I started working on a long-standing request to have the summary dumped in a readable format to text, and specifically to emit to LLVM assembly. Proposal below, please let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Teresa *RFC: LLVM Assembly format for ThinLTO Summary========================================Backgr...

Hi Teresa Thanks for the proposal. Serializing out the summary in a readable format is very help for debugging and development. Some comments inline. > On Apr 24, 2018, at 7:43 AM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I started working on a long-standing request to have the summary dumped...

...the combined index bitcode files. Does that answer your question? Thanks, Teresa > Peter > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I started working on a long-standing request to have the summary dumped >> in a readable format to text, and specifically to emit to LLVM assembly. >> Proposal below, please let me know your thoughts. >> >> Thanks, >> Teresa >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> &...

Hi Teresa, Awesome to see - looking forward to it! On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:44 AM Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I started working on a long-standing request to have the summary dumped in > a readable format to text, and specifically to emit to LLVM assembly. > Proposal below, please let me know your thoughts. > > Thanks, > Teresa > > > > > > > *RFC: LLVM Assembly format for ThinLTO > Summary========================================Bac...

...maries that is independent of the global values that they relate to. Is that something that you plan to address later? Peter On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I started working on a long-standing request to have the summary dumped in > a readable format to text, and specifically to emit to LLVM assembly. > Proposal below, please let me know your thoughts. > > Thanks, > Teresa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >...

...no real benefit. However, I don't have the energy to argue that point any further, so I won't stand in the way here. On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I started working on a long-standing request to have the summary dumped in > a readable format to text, and specifically to emit to LLVM assembly. > Proposal below, please let me know your thoughts. > > Thanks, > Teresa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >...

...t only invites additional complexity and > more ways for things to go wrong for no real benefit. However, I don't have > the energy to argue that point any further, so I won't stand in the way > here. > I assume you are most concerned with the re-assembly/deserialization of the summary. My main goal is to get this dumped into a text format, and I went this route since the last dumper RFC was blocked with the LLVM assembly direction pushed. > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >&gt...

...es. Peter > > Thanks, > Teresa > > >> Peter >> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I started working on a long-standing request to have the summary dumped >>> in a readable format to text, and specifically to emit to LLVM assembly. >>> Proposal below, please let me know your thoughts. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Teresa >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>&gt...

...gt; > > Okay, I get it now. For some reason I got the impression that the > top-level entities in your proposal were the global values and not the > summaries. > Ok great. Probably it was misleading since I used "gv:" as the tag, but that was in reference to the GlobalValueSummary structure name. Thanks, Teresa > Peter > > >> >> Thanks, >> Teresa >> >> >>> Peter >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyo...

When I load a table from a data source and run summary() on it, the summary gives me basic summary statistics I'm looking for, and it also discriminates between quantitative and qualitative data and summarizes them accordingly. For example, if I do this: mydata <- read.table("data.txt") summary(mydata) I would get output li...

...lexity and >> more ways for things to go wrong for no real benefit. However, I don't have >> the energy to argue that point any further, so I won't stand in the way >> here. >> > > I assume you are most concerned with the re-assembly/deserialization of > the summary. My main goal is to get this dumped into a text format, and I > went this route since the last dumper RFC was blocked with the LLVM > assembly direction pushed. > Yes, my main concern is with the deserialization. My view is that it should only be allowed for combined summaries -- allowing...

Dear list members I have a doubt on how p-values for t-statistics are calculated in the summary of Linear Models. Here goes an example: x <- rnorm(100,50,10) y <- rnorm(100,0,5) fit1<-lm(y~x) summary(fit1) summary(fit1)$coef[2] # b summary(fit1)$coef[4] # Std. Error summary(fit1)$coef[6] # t-statistic summary(fit1)$coef[8] # Pr(>|t| summary(fit1)$df [2] # degrees of freedom # t...

Hi, My main concern is this one: > Currently, I am emitting the summary entries at the end, after the metadata nodes. Note that the ModuleSummaryIndex is not currently referenced from the Module, and isn’t currently created when parsing the Module IR bitcode (there is a separate derived class for reading the ModuleSummaryIndex from bitcode). This is because they are no...

Hi Mehdi, thanks for the comments, responses and a tweaked proposal below. Teresa On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > My main concern is this one: > > > Currently, I am emitting the summary entries at the end, after the > metadata nodes. Note that the ModuleSummaryIndex is not currently > referenced from the Module, and isn’t currently created when parsing the > Module IR bitcode (there is a separate derived class for reading the > ModuleSummaryIndex from bitcode). This is...

...ways for things to go wrong for no real benefit. However, I don't have >>> the energy to argue that point any further, so I won't stand in the way >>> here. >>> >> >> I assume you are most concerned with the re-assembly/deserialization of >> the summary. My main goal is to get this dumped into a text format, and I >> went this route since the last dumper RFC was blocked with the LLVM >> assembly direction pushed. >> > > Yes, my main concern is with the deserialization. My view is that it > should only be allowed for comb...

..., thanks for the comments, responses and a tweaked proposal below. Teresa > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com <mailto:joker.eph at gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > My main concern is this one: > > > Currently, I am emitting the summary entries at the end, after the metadata nodes. Note that the ModuleSummaryIndex is not currently referenced from the Module, and isn’t currently created when parsing the Module IR bitcode (there is a separate derived class for reading the ModuleSummaryIndex from bitcode). This is because they are no...

...t; Hi Mehdi, thanks for the comments, responses and a tweaked proposal below. > Teresa > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> My main concern is this one: >> >> > Currently, I am emitting the summary entries at the end, after the >> metadata nodes. Note that the ModuleSummaryIndex is not currently >> referenced from the Module, and isn’t currently created when parsing the >> Module IR bitcode (there is a separate derived class for reading the >> ModuleSummaryIndex from b...

...elow. Teresa >>> >>> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> My main concern is this one: >>>> >>>> > Currently, I am emitting the summary entries at the end, after the >>>> metadata nodes. Note that the ModuleSummaryIndex is not currently >>>> referenced from the Module, and isn’t currently created when parsing the >>>> Module IR bitcode (there is a separate derived class for reading the >>&g...

Hi, I'am using the Xiph Theora Encoder directshow Filter in a csharp application. It works fine but I would like to modify the configuration, like the quality settings. I would like to know if there is a possibility to configure it programmatically without using the propertyPage dialog. Thanks a lot for your help Mathieu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was