>>>>> On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:36, p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk said:
PD> Paul Gilbert <pgilbert@bank-banque-canada.ca> writes:
>> is.recursive(list(z, a=list(1:3)) )
>>
>> R64.2:> [1] FALSE
Splus3.3> [1] T
PD> Yup, it's a bug. Cc'ed to r-bugs so that we don't forget.
>> is.recursive(list(1,2))
PD> [1] FALSE
>> is.recursive(pairlist(1,2))
PD> [1] TRUE
Now fixed.
PD> [maybe Martin would want to add a check that is.whatever works
PD> identically on lists and pairlists. Not is.pairlist, though...]
Added to tests/is-things.R (& .Rout.save).
Both should be in the snapshots (R-devel.tar.gz) shortly..
Martin
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._