Is there a reason that segments()
function (x0, y0, x1, y1, col = par("fg"), lty = par("lty"),
lwd = par("lwd"), xpd = FALSE)
.Internal(segments(x0, y0, x1, y1, col = col, lty = lty, lwd = lwd,
xpd = xpd))
has xpd=FALSE in the second line instead of xpd = par("xpd") ?
Ben Bolker
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
> From: Ben Bolker <ben@eno.Princeton.EDU> > To: R development mailing list <R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch> > Subject: segments() bug? > > Is there a reason that segments() > has xpd=FALSE in the second line instead of xpd = par("xpd") ?Historical reasons? In fact this should be taken care of with a ... argument which passes additional "par" values. I'm doing a pass through the graphics at present and will fix it. Ross -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._