On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 10:36 +0200, Antonio Larrosa wrote:> What do you think of this plan? Does it sound like something that > could be accepted? Of course, if anyone can think of a better way to > implement this, I'd also be glad to read it. > > And just for completion, if this gets a "go ahead", I'll also work on > making sshfs support this.I'd love to hear a maintainer's point of view here. -- Hans Petter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20230523/54b92e1a/attachment.asc>
Historically the view has been if you want NFS-like filesystem over SSH write a dedicated subsystem.? The OpenSSH project stopped following the sftp spec when it tried to "be-everyting-to-everyone" protocol instead of a clean and simple ftp/scp replacement.? As filesystem sharing protocols have oddies between platforms that add a lot of complexity and are unsuited for the original sftp purpose. I suspect this view point still hasn't changed since I officially left the project. - Ben Hans Petter Jansson wrote on 5/23/23 3:28 PM:> On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 10:36 +0200, Antonio Larrosa wrote: > >> What do you think of this plan? Does it sound like something that >> could be accepted? Of course, if anyone can think of a better way to >> implement this, I'd also be glad to read it. >> >> And just for completion, if this gets a "go ahead", I'll also work on >> making sshfs support this. > I'd love to hear a maintainer's point of view here. > > > > _______________________________________________ > openssh-unix-dev mailing list > openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev