Hi,OpenSSH developers My name is Satoshi Turuo, and I'm an editor of Linux information magazine, called "TECH Linux", ASCII Corp in Japan. "TECH Linux" is Linux Magazine for Japanese LINUX Gamers, Newbie LINUX Game Programmers. Newest issue comes with 2 CD-ROMs that loaded with Playabledemos, FreeSoftwares, Sharewares, product advertisements. Right now, we are working on a particular project with which we would like to ask you for your cooperation. The title of this project is; "The COOL Softwares for Linux". We would like your permissions to accomodate the given materials to the CD-ROM of our magazine. (Linux client and server files for OpenSSH Unix Port 2.1.0.[openssh-2.1.0.tar.gz]) If you are interested in the project, please contact me as soon as possible. Actually, deadline of this project is staring us in the face, so I am desperately waiting for you to give the answer back. Thank you very much. If you have any question about TECH Linux or if you send your reply, please contact : Satoshi Turuo satosh-t at ascii.co.jp TECH Linux ASCII CORPORATION. TOKYO, JAPAN.
Hey all: Maybe this has been answered somewhere, or maybe I'm just being stupid, but I was looking at the webpage today, and the links to the "other" operating systems supported by OpenSSH has changed to a page about porting to other OS's, and where you can pick up the ports. So, my question is is the 1.2.x branch of OpenSSH effectively dead? I know OpenSSH 2.1 does SSH1 as well, but I only really want ssh1. Is 1.2.x not going to be maintained anymore, and will all the new bugfixes, etc. be going into OpenSSH 2.x? Thanks! Later, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ J. Paul Reed preed at sigkill.com || www.sigkill.com/preed Forget that I know anything about metallurgy, physics, or engineering, and just tell me what the hell is going on. -- Dr. Venkman, Ghostbusters
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 03:43:23AM -0700, J. Paul Reed wrote:> So, my question is is the 1.2.x branch of OpenSSH effectively dead?there are no branches of OpenSSH. version numbers are arbitrary. version numbers only tell you: beginning with version x this bug y is gone.> I know > OpenSSH 2.1 does SSH1 as well, but I only really want ssh1. Is 1.2.x not > going to be maintained anymore, and will all the new bugfixes, etc. be > going into OpenSSH 2.x?yes, only the current release will be maintained. or to put it in another way: 1.2.x is maintained and the maintained version is called 2.1. what are the problems with OpenSSH 2.1 ? there is no need to enable protocol 2.
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Satoshi Turuo wrote:> Hi,OpenSSH developers > > My name is Satoshi Turuo, and I'm an editor > of Linux information magazine, > called "TECH Linux", ASCII Corp in Japan. > "TECH Linux" is Linux Magazine for Japanese LINUX Gamers, > Newbie LINUX Game Programmers. > Newest issue comes with 2 CD-ROMs that loaded > with Playabledemos, FreeSoftwares, Sharewares, product advertisements. > > Right now, we are working on a particular project > with which we would like to ask you for your cooperation. > The title of this project is; > "The COOL Softwares for Linux". > > We would like your permissions to accomodate the given > materials to the CD-ROM of our magazine. > (Linux client and server files for OpenSSH Unix Port > 2.1.0.[openssh-2.1.0.tar.gz])Absolutely. OpenSSH is released under a free (BSD) license which explicitly allows such distribution. Please do credit the OpenBSD developers for their hard work in making OpenSSH available.> If you are interested in the project, please contact me > as soon as possible. > Actually, deadline of this project is staring us > in the face, so I am desperately waiting for you to > give the answer back.I hope that we were quick enough! When is your deadline? Regards, Damien Miller -- | "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox | Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/ | Email: djm at mindrot.org (home) -or- djm at ibs.com.au (work)