bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2004-Jan-14 22:25 UTC
[Bug 788] request for zlib.h configure test
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788 Summary: request for zlib.h configure test Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: jbasney at ncsa.uiuc.edu I see a configure test for the presence of zlib.h was removed from configure.in in the following revision. ---------------------------- revision 1.317 date: 2001/10/24 05:36:55; author: tim; state: Exp; lines: +10 -10 [configure.in] Fix test for broken dirname. Based on patch from Dave Dykstra <dwd at bell-labs.com>. Remove un-needed test for zlib.h. [contrib/caldera/openssh.spec, contrib/redhat/openssh.spec, contrib/suse/openssh.spec] Update version to match version.h ---------------------------- However, I find that some systems such as an AIX 5.2 system I'm using have /usr/lib/libz.a but no /usr/include/zlib.h (a broken setup, I agree). I see a report at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=106627358830467&w=2 that Compaq Tru64 UNIX has a similar setup. Building OpenSSH on these systems results in a successful configure but a failed compile due to the missing zlib.h. Could the zlib.h check be put back in to configure.ac to catch this problem earlier? I think it might cut down on user confusion. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2004-Jan-14 22:27 UTC
[Bug 788] request for zlib.h configure test
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788 ------- Additional Comments From jbasney at ncsa.uiuc.edu 2004-01-15 09:27 ------- Created an attachment (id=528) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=528&action=view) proposed patch to configure.ac ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2004-Jan-14 23:44 UTC
[Bug 788] request for zlib.h configure test
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-01-15 10:44 ------- Created an attachment (id=529) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=529&action=view) Add test for zlib >= 1.1.4 Seems reasonable, as long as there was no other reason for for the original change. While we're at it I think we should add a test for zlib >= 1.1.4 (since earlier versions have security problems it has been documented as a requirement for a while but not enforced). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2004-Jan-14 23:45 UTC
[Bug 788] request for zlib.h configure test
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Keywords| |patch OS/Version|AIX |All Platform|PPC |All ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2004-Jan-23 03:47 UTC
[Bug 788] request for zlib.h configure test
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |793 nThis| | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2004-Jan-23 05:32 UTC
[Bug 788] request for zlib.h configure test
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #529| |ok Status| | ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2004-01-22 22:32 ------- (From update of attachment 529) ok by me - we may be yelled at by distributors who patch zlib without cranking the version, but if they are willing to patch zlib then they should be willing to patch openssh too :) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2004-Jan-23 06:23 UTC
[Bug 788] request for zlib.h configure test
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-01-22 23:23 ------- OK, done, thanks. zlib 1.1.4 has been out for nearly 2 years, and if a given vendor is backporting zlib fixes, shouldn't they also be backporting openssh fixes anyway... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [Bug 958] patch to support GSI GSSAPI mechanism
- [Bug 1100] GSSAPI-with-mic doesn't handle empty usernames
- [Bug 958] patch to support GSI GSSAPI mechanism
- [Bug 2495] New: add GSI GSSAPI SSO authentication to OpenSSH
- [Bug 1100] GSSAPI-with-mic doesn't handle empty usernames