search for: dwd

Hi, I got stuck within some weird prob concerning my 2-node linux cluster and the synchronisation tool at hand (rsync-2.5.1pre1). I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these directories are hardlinked to the data of the 1st directory. Within this "orig data" directory, I have about 30.000 files, so the amount of files to sync is approx. 2.100.000. The

...uld help me parsing a xml file. I found this website http://www.omegahat.org/RSXML/gettingStarted.html but unfortunately my XML file is not as easy as the one in the example. Example: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <?xml-stylesheet href="http://werdis.dwd.de/css/UNIDART/climateTimeseriesOrderByStation.xsl " type="text/xsl"?> <data xmlns="http://www.unidart.eu/xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.unidart.eu/xsd http://werdis.dwd.de/conf/timese...

Bugzilla doesn't appear to send new bugs to openssh-unix-dev as Damien said he wanted it to, so I'm forwarding the message I got back. - Dave Dykstra ----- Forwarded message from bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org ----- From: bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org To: dwd at bell-labs.com Subject: [Bug 11] New: no reference to bugzilla on openssh home page Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 03:55:32 +1100 (EST) http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 Summary: no reference to bugzilla on openssh home page Product: Portable OpenSSH Versio...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132 ------- Additional Comments From dwd at bell-labs.com 2002-03-02 02:29 ------- Created an attachment (id=30) Patch against CVS of March 1, 2003 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

I am trying to finalize the use of rsync for updatiung a new nfs server before we take the old one offline. I keep getting the following warning during the rsync process: Warning: unexpected rad size of 0 in map_ptr Any ideas where this comes from and how to make it go away? I am using rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 8 to pull data from rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 7. Bob roconnor@vectorpartners.com

----- Forwarded message from bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org ----- From: bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org To: dwd at bell-labs.com Subject: [Bug 13] New: Need faster ssh startup when no /dev/random or prngd available Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 04:25:32 +1100 (EST) http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Summary: Need faster ssh startup when no /dev/random or prngd available...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-02-14 08:50 ------- OpenSSH doesn't currently support changing expired passwords unless you build with PAM support. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

On 14 Dec 2001, dwd@samba.org wrote: > open_socket_in was attempting to try all the protocols returned from > getaddrinfo(), but only if a corresponding call to socket() returned one of > three *NOSUPPORT errno codes. A Redhat 6.2 system was observed returning > EINVAL instead so it never went on to try...

On 6 Dec 2001, Dave Dykstra <dwd@bell-labs.com> wrote: > I still hope to write a --files-from option sometime in 2001. Excuse me if I've forgotten something from earlier: what happens when the sender is remote? Do we send the contents of the file list across along with the arguments, or does this option not work in th...

I want to rsync only a small part of a directory tree. I've set up an exclude and an include file: exclude holds: /* include holds: /iso/1.5.*/i386 I am calling rsync using rsync -avz --include-from="include" --exclude-from="exclude" ftp3.sourceforge.net::/netbsd/iso iso/ but nothing happens. No files transfered. But I would expect rsync to transfer files:

Martin, I want to remind you that there's still an open issue regarding copies when both source and destination are on the local machine (including over NFS): I put a patch into the CVS to automatically imply the '-W' option in that case, and somebody said he was concerned about that because he found that with -W on local copies he had cases where rsync would lock up, and it

Howdy, We occassionally get the following error when running our nightly backups: rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or SIGINT (code 20) at rsync.c(229) This happens more on one or two machines than on any of the others. We've looked high and low to see if we're mistakenly sending these signals, but nothing is that we can find. Does anyone know what this might be from? Is it the server

The second rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz rsync://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz There's also a corresponding '.sig' file that contains a gpg signature of the file; the public key is available on the

That's the way it is. If it's really a one-off change, a huge change in your structure, telnet ssh, rsh, and so forth, work really well for dropping in and deleting stuff (unless you're supplying the master, and other systems out of your control copy from you). Rsync is optimized for taking a filesystem in an unknown state, and making it identical to another filesystem in an unknown

...he same problem with SSH 3.1.p1 and both DONT have the problem with SSH 2.9.9p1 - so I assume this is something highly specific to SSH 3.1.1.p1 Hope this helps - I am reluctant to start swapping signals around etc. Mark Pitt SP Administrator IBM, Campus Winterthur 058-333-1542 Dave Dykstra <dwd@bell-labs.com> on 09.05.2002 16:34:57 Please respond to Dave Dykstra <dwd@bell-labs.com> To: Mark Pitt/Switzerland/Contr/IBM@IBMCH cc: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: openssh 3.1 and rsync dont work I want to fix this in rsync too. I developed what I think is a good fix an...

We've got set of servers that use AFD (http://www.dwd.de/AFD) to scp files to a set of receiving servers. There are about 25 sending machines, and 12 receiving machines. All the servers are RHEL 4 and 5, with the senders running openssh 4.3p2, and the receivers running 3.9p1. Most files are sent without a problem, but on a pretty regular basis, we...

I get the following log messages using rsync 2.5.1 compiled on Solaris 8 when using the "hosts allow" option in rsyncd.conf: 2002/01/23 12:09:51 [28276] rsync: reverse name lookup mismatch on fd0 - spoofed address? 2002/01/23 12:10:18 [28276] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (16 bytes read so far) Resolv.conf/DNS are configured and working properly with both A and PTR records

On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 17:34:10, Andre Lucas wrote: > Subject: /dev/urandom > On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 09:24:01AM -0700, SysProg - Nathan Paul Simons wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Ben Taylor wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Max Shaposhnikov wrote: > > > > why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris? > > > > i think the

Hello, I have set up an anonymous rsync server that seems to work as expected. However when I try to access the server from several other unix boxes using rsync with a command like this; rsync netlib3.cs.utk.edu::netlib I get the motd and then a line that states client: nothing to do Now I would expect this to give me a directory listing. I do get the directory listing as expected when

...n't what you were suggesting, could you elaborate? Thanks, --Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Mats Andersson [mailto:mats at mindbright.se] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 12:30 AM > To: Lewandowsky, Matt > Cc: 'Gert Doering'; J.S.Peatfield at damtp.cam.ac.uk; dwd at bell-labs.com; > openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Subject: ssh through proxy (was: prng_cmds/init_rng() question/patch) > > > > Hi, > > Sorry for pushing this even further off topic but since > someone mentioned > MindTerm I couldn't resist answering :-) &...