xen discuss - Sep 2008 - S10 (05/08) vs SNV_98 stubdom install at Xen 3.3 CentOS 5.2 Dom0 (64-bit)

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

During install in stub domain F9,CentOS 5.X load "ata_piix" driver
exactly as on old S478 Intel Boards.
Compare with CR 6650131 i see same errors when loading SNV_79,SNV_98 in stub
domain :
*******************************************************************************************
Configuring /dev
ata_command: BSY too long!DRDY 0x1 CMD 0xe0 F 0x0 N 0x0 S 0x0 H 0x0 CL 0x0 CH
0x0
******************************************************************************************
Dell 4550 mentined in CR 6650131 has board described at:-
http://www.ascendtech.us/itemdesc.asp?ic=MB4DELJ0592

* Support for an Intel® Pentium® 4 processor in a mPGA478 socket with a 400/533
MHz system bus
* Support for an Intel® Celeron® processor in    a  mPGA478 socket with a 400
MHz system bus
* Intel® 845PE Chipset
* Two Parallel ATA IDE interfaces with UDMA 33, ATA-66/100 support

My guess would be ,  that current Nevada Builds won't install on Intel S478
boards with mentioned ATA specs, no matter of PC been build on the board with
Intel S478. (years 2000-2002).
However , Solaris 10 will. Unfortunately, i don't have any Intel S478 board
to test.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
xen-discuss@opensolaris.org

Looks like Debian Etch kernel is not happy loading in stub domain, however,
finally it gets loaded :-
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: Probing IDE interface ide0...
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: 8139cp: 10/100 PCI Ethernet driver v1.2 (Mar
22, 2004)
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: QEMU HARDDISK, ATA DISK drive
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hdb: QEMU HARDDISK, ATA DISK drive
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: Probing IDE interface ide1...
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: GSI 16 sharing vector 0xA9 and IRQ 16
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:04.0[A] ->
GSI 32 (level, low) -> IRQ 169
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: eth0: RTL-8139C+ at 0xffffc20000002000,
00:16:3e:13:5e:9f, IRQ 169
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: PCI: Setting latency timer of device
0000:00:04.0 to 64
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.27
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: max request size: 512KiB
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: 32146002 sectors (16458 MB) w/256KiB
Cache, CHS=16383/255/63, (U)DMA
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: cache flushes supported
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel:  hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 >
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: irq timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xea
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hdb: max request size: 512KiB
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hdb: 2097152 sectors (1073 MB) w/256KiB
Cache, CHS=2080/255/63, (U)DMA
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hdb: cache flushes supported
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel:  hdb: unknown partition table
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xea
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: DMA disabled
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hdb: DMA disabled
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide0: reset: success
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: irq timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xea
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide0: reset: success
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: irq timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xea
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hdb: max request size: 512KiB
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hdb: 2097152 sectors (1073 MB) w/256KiB
Cache, CHS=2080/255/63, (U)DMA
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hdb: cache flushes supported
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel:  hdb: unknown partition table
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xea
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: DMA disabled
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hdb: DMA disabled
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide0: reset: success
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: irq timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xea
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide0: reset: success
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: irq timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xea
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide0: reset: success
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: irq timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xea
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: Attempting manual resume
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0x80 { Busy }
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: hda: drive not ready for command
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: ide0: reset: success
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5
seconds
Oct  2 13:10:30 Debian4stub kernel: EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered
data mode.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org

> During install in stub domain F8,F9,CentOS 5.X load
> "ata_piix" driver exactly as on old S478 Intel
> Boards.
> Compare with CR 6650131 i see same errors when
> loading SNV_79,SNV_98 in stub domain :
> ******************************************************
> *************************************
> Configuring /dev
> ata_command: BSY too long!DRDY 0x1 CMD 0xe0 F 0x0 N
> 0x0 S 0x0 H 0x0 CL 0x0 CH 0x0
> ******************************************************
> ************************************
> Dell 4550 mentined in CR 6650131 has board described
> at:-
> http://www.ascendtech.us/itemdesc.asp?ic=MB4DELJ0592
> 
> * Support for an Intel® Pentium® 4 processor in a
> mPGA478 socket with a 400/533 MHz system bus
> * Support for an Intel® Celeron® processor in    a
>  mPGA478 socket with a 400 MHz system bus
>  Intel® 845PE Chipset
> Two Parallel ATA IDE interfaces with UDMA 33,
>  ATA-66/100 support
> 
> My guess would be ,  that current Nevada Builds won't
> install on Intel S478 boards with mentioned ATA
> specs, no matter of PC been built on the board with
> Intel S478. (years 2000-2002).
> However , Solaris 10 will. Unfortunately, i don't
> have any Intel S478 board to test.
***************************************
Failure reproduce  CR 6650131
***************************************
I've made an attempt to reprodule CR 6650131 on the box assembled with:-
CPU P4 2.6 GHZ
1 GB RAM
Board :
ECS (Elitegroup) 845PE-A
2 channel UltraDMA/100/66/33 Bus Master IDE (with support for up to 4
ATAPI-devices)
80 GB IDE Seagate Barracuda.

SNV_94 loaded with no problems and entered configuration phase.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
xen-discuss@opensolaris.org

> > During install in stub domain F8,F9,CentOS 5.X
> load
> > "ata_piix" driver exactly as on old S478 Intel
> > Boards.
> > Compare with CR 6650131 i see same errors when
> > loading SNV_79,SNV_98 in stub domain :
> >
> ******************************************************
> 
> > *************************************
> > Configuring /dev
> > ata_command: BSY too long!DRDY 0x1 CMD 0xe0 F 0x0
> N
> > 0x0 S 0x0 H 0x0 CL 0x0 CH 0x0
> >
> ******************************************************
> 
> > ************************************
> > Dell 4550 mentined in CR 6650131 has board
> described
> > at:-
> >
> http://www.ascendtech.us/itemdesc.asp?ic=MB4DELJ0592
> > 
> > * Support for an Intel® Pentium® 4 processor in a
> > mPGA478 socket with a 400/533 MHz system bus
> > * Support for an Intel® Celeron® processor in    a
> >  mPGA478 socket with a 400 MHz system bus
> >  Intel® 845PE Chipset
> > Two Parallel ATA IDE interfaces with UDMA 33,
> >  ATA-66/100 support
> > 
> > My guess would be ,  that current Nevada Builds
> won't
> > install on Intel S478 boards with mentioned ATA
> > specs, no matter of PC been built on the board
> with
> > Intel S478. (years 2000-2002).
> > However , Solaris 10 will. Unfortunately, i don't
> > have any Intel S478 board to test.
> ***************************************
> Failure reproduce  CR 6650131
> ***************************************
> I've made an attempt to reprodule CR 6650131 on the
> box assembled with:-
> CPU P4 2.6 GHZ
> 1 GB RAM
> Board :
> ECS (Elitegroup) 845PE-A
> 2 channel UltraDMA/100/66/33 Bus Master IDE (with
> support for up to 4 ATAPI-devices) 
> 80 GB IDE Seagate Barracuda.
> 
> SNV_94 loaded with no problems and entered
> configuration phase.
**************************************************
CR 6650131 reproduced on mentioned hardware
**************************************************
It's a kind of difficult to explain, message
"ata-command select failed" began come up
on regular basis some hours later with another
similar IDE drive. I had to replace IDE drive to 
be able perform complete test and proceed to 
deployment phase.Entering deployment phase 
i get message "No hard drive found".
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
xen-discuss@opensolaris.org