Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "snv_79".
Did you mean:
snv_78
2007 Dec 12
2
Xend will not start, prints ominous sounding error at boot
...s so I''m not *sure* if that correlates but it
seems suspicious in my mind.
Any thoughts on what''s going on here? Better still, any way to fix
things? The backing store for the windows install is a zvol
("localpool/xvm/winxp").
I''m getting ready to install snv_79... would an upgrade install fix
things up? I''m assuming a full reinstall would fix it.
Thanks in advance!
-Peter
2008 Sep 28
4
S10 (05/08) vs SNV_98 stubdom install at Xen 3.3 CentOS 5.2 Dom0 (64-bit)
[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]
2007 Dec 12
1
6604198 - single thread for compression
Hello zfs-discuss,
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6604198-1
Is there a patch for S10? I thought it''s been fixed.
--
Best regards,
Robert mailto:rmilkowski at task.gda.pl
http://milek.blogspot.com
2008 Mar 13
12
7-disk raidz achieves 430 MB/s reads and 220 MB/s writes on a $1320 box
...0 0 7275 7075 691 99 146 354 0 321 0 89 0 10
1 0 0 0 221 2 844 43 150 244 0 241 0 88 0 11
(The dual-core CPU is almost(?) a bottleneck at 90% utilization on both cores.
For this reason I doubt such a read throughput could have been reached
pre-snv_79 because checksum verification/calculation only became multithreaded
in snv_79 and after.)
-marc
2008 Jul 06
14
confusion and frustration with zpool
I have a zpool which has grown "organically". I had a 60Gb disk, I added a 120, I added a 500, I got a 750 and sliced it and mirrored the other pieces.
The 60 and the 120 are internal PATA drives, the 500 and 750 are Maxtor OneTouch USB drives.
The original system I created the 60+120+500 pool on was Solaris 10 update 3, patched to use ZFS sometime last fall (November I believe). In