what do you guys think about the best way to use DB_RECOVERY_FILE_DEST
with ocfs? specifically, I'm wondering about archive logs... one thing
i really like about using a flash recovery area it's space management
features (after i copy my archivelogs to tape, it still keeps a copy
around until it needs to reclaim the space)
with ocfs v1 i've always wanted to give each node it's own ocfs volume
for archiving - to avoid metadata (ocfs directory) contention during
file creation. does this mean that if i want to have the advantage of
DB_RECOVERY_FILE_DEST on a RAC system, i really should use ASM instead
of ocfs? would it be better not to use this new 10g features until ocfs
v2 (which supposedly will handle file creation/deletion operations much
better than v1)?
curious to hear everybody's thoughts,
Jeremy
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual(s) and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any
action based on it, by anyone other than the intended recipient(s), is strictly
prohibited.
<<<<...>>>>
