On 22-3-2017 14:37, Charles Lepple wrote:> On Mar 22, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Marc Kessels <marc at kessels.name> wrote: >> Hi Charles, >> >> >> Upsmart version is 1.5, copyright says 2012-2014 > Do you have a direct link? I found UPSmart-DryContact-V3-4.zip and UPSmart-Networking-V2-4.zip via web search, but the dates for the Linux components are ~ 2002.my version came from the supplied CD, but it can be found online as well: http://www.gembird.nl/service.aspx?item=8087&key=eg-ups-033#item>> the github issue seems a bit worse, since it reports: >> >> received 10 (85) >> 1.158700 read: UPS No Ack >> >> whereas my system reports : >> >> 6.239688 Full update... >> 6.239776 send: Q1 >> 6.261270 received 47 (40) >> 6.261371 read: (234.0 000.0 234.0 012 49.9 27.4 29.0 00001000 >> >> but it keeps repeating the last line, so I am not getting any update. > I might have been confusing that issue with this comment in the parent thread, which seems to be similar underlying hardware repeating the last reading: > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/307#issuecomment-243364229 > > The #409 report might have been due to a combination of the auto-detection, plus the lack of "vendor magic" from UPSmart.indeed, the #307 looks remarkably the same. attached the wireshark traces for the UPSmart software and the nut software. I see some differences, but I can't decipher what's going on there... hope you can share some insight. thanks, marc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: nut.pcapng.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 1008 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20170322/49dd96ae/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: upsmart.pcapng.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 1225 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20170322/49dd96ae/attachment-0001.bin>
The software UPSmart 1.5 is the same as I am using in this thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2016-November/007248.html (starts in 2016-August) for the powercool 1500VA USB UPS. Have not yet been successful with getting it working with NUT but the symptoms are the same and you may find some of the debug useful from https://github.com/mattwire/powercool-ups If it helps, I can provide additional logging/testing etc. On 22 March 2017 at 14:09, Marc Kessels <marc at kessels.name> wrote:> > > On 22-3-2017 14:37, Charles Lepple wrote: > >> On Mar 22, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Marc Kessels <marc at kessels.name> wrote: >> >>> Hi Charles, >>> >>> >>> Upsmart version is 1.5, copyright says 2012-2014 >>> >> Do you have a direct link? I found UPSmart-DryContact-V3-4.zip and >> UPSmart-Networking-V2-4.zip via web search, but the dates for the Linux >> components are ~ 2002. >> > my version came from the supplied CD, but it can be found online as well: > http://www.gembird.nl/service.aspx?item=8087&key=eg-ups-033#item > >> the github issue seems a bit worse, since it reports: >>> >>> received 10 (85) >>> 1.158700 read: UPS No Ack >>> >>> whereas my system reports : >>> >>> 6.239688 Full update... >>> 6.239776 send: Q1 >>> 6.261270 received 47 (40) >>> 6.261371 read: (234.0 000.0 234.0 012 49.9 27.4 29.0 00001000 >>> >>> but it keeps repeating the last line, so I am not getting any update. >>> >> I might have been confusing that issue with this comment in the parent >> thread, which seems to be similar underlying hardware repeating the last >> reading: >> >> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/307#issuecomment-243364229 >> >> The #409 report might have been due to a combination of the >> auto-detection, plus the lack of "vendor magic" from UPSmart. >> > indeed, the #307 looks remarkably the same. > > attached the wireshark traces for the UPSmart software and the nut > software. I see some differences, but I can't decipher what's going on > there... > hope you can share some insight. > > thanks, > marc > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > Nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20170322/44c2e72e/attachment.html>
Matthew Wire
2017-Mar-22 19:50 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Fwd: contineously receiving the same values
The software UPSmart 1.5 is the same as I am using in this thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2016-November/007248. html (starts in 2016-August) for the powercool 1500VA USB UPS. Have not yet been successful with getting it working with NUT but the symptoms are the same and you may find some of the debug useful from https://github.com/ mattwire/powercool-ups If it helps, I can provide additional logging/testing etc. On 22 March 2017 at 14:09, Marc Kessels <marc at kessels.name> wrote:> > > On 22-3-2017 14:37, Charles Lepple wrote: > >> On Mar 22, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Marc Kessels <marc at kessels.name> wrote: >> >>> Hi Charles, >>> >>> >>> Upsmart version is 1.5, copyright says 2012-2014 >>> >> Do you have a direct link? I found UPSmart-DryContact-V3-4.zip and >> UPSmart-Networking-V2-4.zip via web search, but the dates for the Linux >> components are ~ 2002. >> > my version came from the supplied CD, but it can be found online as well: > http://www.gembird.nl/service.aspx?item=8087&key=eg-ups-033#item > >> the github issue seems a bit worse, since it reports: >>> >>> received 10 (85) >>> 1.158700 read: UPS No Ack >>> >>> whereas my system reports : >>> >>> 6.239688 Full update... >>> 6.239776 send: Q1 >>> 6.261270 received 47 (40) >>> 6.261371 read: (234.0 000.0 234.0 012 49.9 27.4 29.0 00001000 >>> >>> but it keeps repeating the last line, so I am not getting any update. >>> >> I might have been confusing that issue with this comment in the parent >> thread, which seems to be similar underlying hardware repeating the last >> reading: >> >> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/307#issuecomment-243364229 >> >> The #409 report might have been due to a combination of the >> auto-detection, plus the lack of "vendor magic" from UPSmart. >> > indeed, the #307 looks remarkably the same. > > attached the wireshark traces for the UPSmart software and the nut > software. I see some differences, but I can't decipher what's going on > there... > hope you can share some insight. > > thanks, > marc > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > Nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20170322/c9f8752b/attachment-0001.html>