Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "gembird".
Did you mean:
embird
2017 Mar 22
2
contineously receiving the same values
...smart version is 1.5, copyright says 2012-2014
> Do you have a direct link? I found UPSmart-DryContact-V3-4.zip and UPSmart-Networking-V2-4.zip via web search, but the dates for the Linux components are ~ 2002.
my version came from the supplied CD, but it can be found online as
well: http://www.gembird.nl/service.aspx?item=8087&key=eg-ups-033#item
>> the github issue seems a bit worse, since it reports:
>>
>> received 10 (85)
>> 1.158700 read: UPS No Ack
>>
>> whereas my system reports :
>>
>> 6.239688 Full update...
>> 6.239...
2015 Mar 09
0
nutdrv_atcl_usb
...erval to 64 microframes, ep desc
says 80 microframes
kernel: hid-generic 0003:0001:0000.0002: hiddev0,hidraw1: USB HID
v1.11 Device [ATCL FOR UPS ATCL FOR UPS] on usb-0000:03:00.0-2/input0
and the attached capture.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Gembird-UPS-PS-001.pcap.tar.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 16303 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20150309/239457e2/attachment-0001.bin>
2014 Nov 09
4
nutdrv_atcl_usb
On Nov 8, 2014, at 7:01 PM, hyouko at gmail.com wrote:
> Since this UPS seems to be supported by UPSmart2000I, it could use a
> serial-over-usb implementation of the megatec protocol.
Dan, that is a good point - I had not considered it. I assume companies will copy bogus product IDs, but the use of the exact same USB string descriptor is odd.
Did you have a chance to compare the rest of
2017 Mar 22
0
contineously receiving the same values
...t;>
>> Do you have a direct link? I found UPSmart-DryContact-V3-4.zip and
>> UPSmart-Networking-V2-4.zip via web search, but the dates for the Linux
>> components are ~ 2002.
>>
> my version came from the supplied CD, but it can be found online as well:
> http://www.gembird.nl/service.aspx?item=8087&key=eg-ups-033#item
>
>> the github issue seems a bit worse, since it reports:
>>>
>>> received 10 (85)
>>> 1.158700 read: UPS No Ack
>>>
>>> whereas my system reports :
>>>
>>> 6.239688...
2017 Mar 22
2
contineously receiving the same values
Hi Charles,
Upsmart version is 1.5, copyright says 2012-2014
the github issue seems a bit worse, since it reports:
received 10 (85)
1.158700 read: UPS No Ack
whereas my system reports :
6.239688 Full update...
6.239776 send: Q1
6.261270 received 47 (40)
6.261371 read: (234.0 000.0 234.0 012 49.9 27.4 29.0 00001000
but it keeps repeating the last line,