I tried viewing your link, but it returns a 404 error. It also doesn't seem to have a valid certificate. Could you send the correct link please? On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Stuart Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> wrote:> On 10/06/2016 07:26 PM, Lane Russell wrote: > > ?? > Syslog after server loses sight of UPS: > Oct 6 17:29:01 kvm usbhid-ups[3529]: libusb_get_string: error sending > control message: Broken pipe > Oct 6 17:30:53 kvm upsd[3533]: Data for UPS [ups] is stale - check driver > Oct 6 17:30:57 kvm upsmon[3548]: Poll UPS [ups at localhost] failed - Data > stale > Oct 6 17:30:57 kvm upsmon[3548]: Communications with UPS ups at localhost > lost > Oct 6 17:30:57 kvm upssched[32410]: Executing command: notifycommbad > > My Tripplight SMART1500LCDT > <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009TZTGWK/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1> > has the same problem, with the above preceded by: > > Oct 2 22:20:02 fairfax kernel: hub 1-1.1.1:1.0: port 4 disabled by hub > (EMI?), re-enabling... > Oct 2 22:20:02 fairfax kernel: usb 1-1.1.1.4: USB disconnect, device > number 19 > Oct 2 22:20:04 fairfax nagios: HOST ALERT: h.dvorak;DOWN;SOFT;1;(Host > Check Timed Out) > Oct 2 22:20:06 fairfax kernel: hub 1-1.1.1:1.0: Cannot enable port 4. > Maybe the USB cable is bad? > Oct 2 22:20:10 fairfax kernel: hub 1-1.1.1:1.0: Cannot enable port 4. > Maybe the USB cable is bad? > Oct 2 22:20:14 fairfax kernel: hub 1-1.1.1:1.0: Cannot enable port 4. > Maybe the USB cable is bad? > Oct 2 22:20:17 fairfax kernel: hub 1-1.1.1:1.0: Cannot enable port 4. > Maybe the USB cable is bad? > Oct 2 22:20:17 fairfax kernel: hub 1-1.1.1:1.0: unable to enumerate USB > device on port 4 > > I was able to get it to run unattended with this hack: > https://gathman.org/2016/07/30/Standard_Schmandard/ > > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > Nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20161010/ed129713/attachment.html>
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Lane Russell wrote:> I tried viewing your link, but it returns a 404 error. It also doesn't seem > to have a valid certificate. Could you send the correct link please?I tried from Texas, Miami, Virginia, and New York VPSes. Works fine. Maybe try again, or check your local DNS?> I was able to get it to run unattended with this hack: > https://gathman.org/2016/07/30/Standard_Schmandard/-- Stuart D. Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> "Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
Huh, must be an OpenDNS issue, it works from my phone. I wonder if I'm running into a similar defect on the PC UPS... I could try resetting the driver every few hours (this, in addition to replugging the cable fixes the issue temporarily), but that does feel like a hack that doesn't fix the root cause. I will try returning the unit and give APC a go. I've previously had good luck with one of their older units. I'll update here as to whether that fixes my issue. On October 10, 2016 1:12:01 PM CDT, "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart at gathman.org> wrote:>On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Lane Russell wrote: > >> I tried viewing your link, but it returns a 404 error. It also >doesn't seem >> to have a valid certificate. Could you send the correct link please? > >I tried from Texas, Miami, Virginia, and New York VPSes. Works fine. >Maybe try again, or check your local DNS? > >> I was able to get it to run unattended with this hack: >> https://gathman.org/2016/07/30/Standard_Schmandard/ > >-- > Stuart D. Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> >"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for >a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20161010/5df55edb/attachment-0001.html>
On 10/10/2016 11:12 AM, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Lane Russell wrote: > >> I tried viewing your link, but it returns a 404 error. It also doesn't seem >> to have a valid certificate. Could you send the correct link please? > > I tried from Texas, Miami, Virginia, and New York VPSes. Works fine. > Maybe try again, or check your local DNS? > >> I was able to get it to run unattended with this hack: >> https://gathman.org/2016/07/30/Standard_Schmandard/ >Stuart, The issue is the certificate presented by your server (gathman.org) is not signed by a well-known CA. Also, it looks like the certificate is valid only for fairfax.gathman.org, while the URL you provided is to gathman.org. Because of this, normal browsers will complain about the certificate unless the user creates an "exception" (installs your certificate locally and authorizes it for use when contacting your web site). If you want to avoid this, you need to purchase a certificate signed by a well-known CA and install that on your server. If you don't want to do that, just be aware that anyone connecting to your server is going to get a similar error. Note that *you* don't get this error probably because you've installed an exception for your certificate to your local browser. No matter what path you take to get to the server, your browser will accept the certificate and display the site without the warning. As an alternative, you can offer the non-SSL URL to the content, if your server allows for such access. This won't require the use of a certificate. FYI.
> On Oct 10, 2016, at 2:12 PM, Stuart D. Gathman <stuart at gathman.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Lane Russell wrote: > >> I tried viewing your link, but it returns a 404 error. It also doesn't seem >> to have a valid certificate. Could you send the correct link please? > > I tried from Texas, Miami, Virginia, and New York VPSes. Works fine. > Maybe try again, or check your local DNS?Google's 8.8.8.8 DNS returns the following: $ host gathman.org gathman.org has address 70.184.247.44 gathman.org has IPv6 address 2001:470:8:809::1010 I'm getting a 404 using the IPv4 address. Is it possible that Lane's phone was using IPv6 when it worked?