Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "wosigns".
Did you mean:
wosign
2016 Jun 16
2
https and self signed
On 15.06.2016 15:57, ????????? ???????? wrote:
> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g.
>
> http://www.startssl.com
> http://buy.wosign.com/free
that is right, but hink of your potential clients, because
wosign has a problem - slow OCSP, ...
because their server infrastucture is located in China, and not the best
bandwidth ...
when validity checks
2016 Jun 15
8
https and self signed
On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:57 AM, ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su> wrote:
>
> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g.
>
> http://www.startssl.com
> http://buy.wosign.com/free
Today, I would prefer Let?s Encrypt:
https://letsencrypt.org/
It is philosophically aligned with the open source software world, rather than act as bait
2016 Jun 15
8
https and self signed
I followed the instructions here https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Https
Checking port 80 I get the file...
curl http://localhost/file.html
<HTML>
<FORM>
Working
</FORM>
</HTML>
Checking port 443 I get and error
curl https://localhost/file.html
curl: (60) Peer's certificate issuer has been marked as not trusted by the
user.
More details here:
2016 Jun 16
2
https and self signed
On 16.06.2016 21:42, ????????? ???????? wrote:
>> that is right, but hink of your potential clients, because
>> wosign has a problem - slow OCSP, ...
>> because their server infrastucture is located in China, and not the
>> best bandwidth ...
>>
>> when validity checks of the used SSL certificate very probable fail,
>> it is worse than not using SSL ...
2016 Jun 15
1
https and self signed
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:02:57AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Wed, June 15, 2016 9:17 am, Warren Young wrote:
> >>
> >> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g.
> >
> > Today, I would prefer Let???s Encrypt:
> >
> > https://letsencrypt.org/
> >
> > It is philosophically aligned with the open
2016 Jun 15
0
https and self signed
On Wed, June 15, 2016 9:17 am, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:57 AM, ?????????????????? ????????????????
> <nevis2us at infoline.su> wrote:
>>
>> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g.
>>
>> http://www.startssl.com
>> http://buy.wosign.com/free
>
> Today, I would prefer Let???s Encrypt:
>
>
2016 Jun 15
3
https and self signed
On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote:
>
> I do see WoSign there (though I'd prefer to avoid my US located servers
> have certificates signed by authority located in China, hence located sort
> of behind "the great firewall of China" - call me superstitious).
That?s a perfectly valid concern. The last I heard, modern
2016 Oct 10
1
CP1500AVRLCD NOCOMM
On 10/10/2016 11:12 AM, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Lane Russell wrote:
>
>> I tried viewing your link, but it returns a 404 error. It also doesn't seem
>> to have a valid certificate. Could you send the correct link please?
>
> I tried from Texas, Miami, Virginia, and New York VPSes. Works fine.
> Maybe try again, or check your local DNS?
>
2016 Jun 15
0
https and self signed
Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g.
http://www.startssl.com
http://buy.wosign.com/free
2016 Jun 16
0
https and self signed
On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:57 AM, ????????? ????????<nevis2us at infoline.su> wrote:
>> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g.
>>
>> http://www.startssl.com
>> http://buy.wosign.com/free
> Today, I would prefer Let?s Encrypt:
>
> https://letsencrypt.org/
>
> It is
2016 Jun 16
0
https and self signed
> that is right, but hink of your potential clients, because
> wosign has a problem - slow OCSP, ...
> because their server infrastucture is located in China, and not the
> best bandwidth ...
>
> when validity checks of the used SSL certificate very probable fail,
> it is worse than not using SSL ...
I don't think OCSP is critical for free certificates suitable for small
2016 Jun 17
0
https and self signed
Walter H. ????? 2016-06-16 22:54:
> On 16.06.2016 21:42, ????????? ???????? wrote:
>>> that is right, but hink of your potential clients, because
>>> wosign has a problem - slow OCSP, ...
>>> because their server infrastucture is located in China, and not the
>>> best bandwidth ...
>>>
>>> when validity checks of the used SSL certificate
2016 Jun 17
0
https and self signed
> yes and no, but faking a valid OCSP response that says good instead of
> revoked is also possible ...
Could you please provide any proof for that statement? If it were true
the whole PKI infrastructure should probably be thrown out of the
window. )
> the primary reason was to prevent problems for connection problems -
> or whatever problems - in connection with the OCSP
Sure.
2016 Jun 17
2
https and self signed
On 17.06.2016 19:57, ????????? ???????? wrote:
>>> Then OCSP stapling is the way to go but it could be a real PITA to
>>> setup for the first time and may not be supported by older browsers
>>> anyway.
>>>
>> not really, because the same server tells the client that the SSL
>> certificate is good, as the SSL certificate itself;
>> these must