Nut upsuser - Oct 2014 - Socomec ITYS 3000 + Netvision upsmon output

On 02.10.2014 03:42, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Tarvo.Tiits at automaatika.ee wrote:
>
>> Why is ups.status empty?
> If I understand the commit log for SVN r3590, then that revision was
supposed to set the status to OL if the numeric state was 9 for ECO mode. It
does not appear to do that:
>
>
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/9cb2de3d9568aa382cc118b4385d97d5664c457b
>
> Is your UPS set to ECO mode? Can you do a snmpget on
.1.3.6.1.4.1.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0?
>
UPS is on inverter, not ECO mode,

snmpget -v1 -c public 192.168.xxx.xxx .1.3.6.1.4.1.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0 = INTEGER: 2

On Oct 2, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Tarvo Tiits <Tarvo.Tiits at automaatika.ee>
wrote:
> On 02.10.2014 03:42, Charles Lepple wrote:
>> On Oct 1, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Tarvo.Tiits at automaatika.ee wrote:
>> 
>>> Why is ups.status empty?
>> If I understand the commit log for SVN r3590, then that revision was
supposed to set the status to OL if the numeric state was 9 for ECO mode. It
does not appear to do that:
>> 
>>
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/9cb2de3d9568aa382cc118b4385d97d5664c457b
>> 
>> Is your UPS set to ECO mode? Can you do a snmpget on
.1.3.6.1.4.1.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0?
>> 
> UPS is on inverter, not ECO mode,
> 
> snmpget -v1 -c public 192.168.xxx.xxx .1.3.6.1.4.1.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0
> SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0 = INTEGER: 2
2 also is explicitly mapped to "". I'm wondering if your UPS has a
different interpretation. Do you have a MIB file?

Also CC'ing Arnaud to see if he has any additional details. He may be
interested in a full SNMP walk (please gzip and attach to the message).

-- 
Charles Lepple
clepple at gmail

Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote on 02.10.2014 15:15:29:
> Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>
> 02.10.2014 15:15
>
> To.
>
> Tarvo Tiits <Tarvo.Tiits at automaatika.ee>
>
> cc
>
> NUT List <nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org>, Arnaud Quette
> <aquette.dev at gmail.com>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [Nut-upsuser] Socomec ITYS 3000 + Netvision upsmon output
>
> On Oct 2, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Tarvo Tiits <Tarvo.Tiits at
automaatika.ee>
wrote:
>
> > On 02.10.2014 03:42, Charles Lepple wrote:
> >> On Oct 1, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Tarvo.Tiits at automaatika.ee wrote:
> >>
> >>> Why is ups.status empty?
> >> If I understand the commit log for SVN r3590, then that revision
> was supposed to set the status to OL if the numeric state was 9 for
> ECO mode. It does not appear to do that:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/
> 9cb2de3d9568aa382cc118b4385d97d5664c457b
> >>
> >> Is your UPS set to ECO mode? Can you do a snmpget on .1.3.6.1.4.
> 1.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0?
> >>
> > UPS is on inverter, not ECO mode,
> >
> > snmpget -v1 -c public 192.168.xxx.xxx .1.3.6.1.4.1.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0
> > SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.4555.1.1.1.1.4.1.0 = INTEGER: 2
>
> 2 also is explicitly mapped to "". I'm wondering if your UPS
has a
> different interpretation. Do you have a MIB file?
>
> Also CC'ing Arnaud to see if he has any additional details. He may
> be interested in a full SNMP walk (please gzip and attach to the
message).
>
> --
> Charles Lepple
> clepple at gmail
>
>
Here is snmpwalk output and MIB file.
(See attached file: NetVision-nv6-unix.mib.gz)(See attached file:
snmpwalk.gz)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NetVision-nv6-unix.mib.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 12815 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20141002/2e85bfd9/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: snmpwalk.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3375 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20141002/2e85bfd9/attachment-0003.obj>