Nut upsdev - Oct 2005 - apc-hid tests with the new ups_status updates

Peter,

Here are the transitions that I have tested with your latest changes
(on the APC/Back-UPS ES 650):
1) OL ==> OB DISCHRG followed by OB DISCHRG ==> OL (no CHRG inbetween)
2) OL CHRG ==> OL
3) OL CHRG ==> OL CHRG LB (by manipulating battery.charge.low)
4) OL CHRG LB ==> OL CHRG (i.e. transition from below)
5) OB DISCHRG ==> FSD OB DISCHRG LB followed by proper shutdown
In other words, as far as I can see everything works as expected.
Also, "load.off" indeed shuts the load on my APC/Back-UPS ES 650 
instantaneously (not that I intended to test that!).

BTW, I usually do the same types of builds that you reccommended, 
just from time to time I go back to a clean slate, and today was 
unfortunately one of those times! And no, the fix for the al175.c
compile problem hasn't reached the development tree yet!

Hope this helps, AG

-- 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Alfred Ganz					alfred-ganz@agci.com
   AG Consulting, Inc.				(203) 624-9667
   440 Prospect Street # 11
   New Haven, CT 06511
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Alfred Ganz wrote:
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Here are the transitions that I have tested with your latest changes
> (on the APC/Back-UPS ES 650):
> 1) OL ==> OB DISCHRG followed by OB DISCHRG ==> OL (no CHRG
inbetween)
> 2) OL CHRG ==> OL
> 3) OL CHRG ==> OL CHRG LB (by manipulating battery.charge.low)
> 4) OL CHRG LB ==> OL CHRG (i.e. transition from below)
> 5) OB DISCHRG ==> FSD OB DISCHRG LB followed by proper shutdown
> In other words, as far as I can see everything works as expected.
> Also, "load.off" indeed shuts the load on my APC/Back-UPS ES 650 
> instantaneously (not that I intended to test that!).
Excellent! Thanks for the testing. -- Peter