James Jones
2020-Jul-27 18:51 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
On 7/23/20 9:06 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:> On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:34, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote: >> >> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK() >> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace >> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa >> drivers are still aware of only these older >> format modifiers which do not differentiate >> between different variations of the block linear >> layout. When the format modifier support flag was >> flipped in the nouveau kernel driver, the X.org >> modesetting driver began attempting to use its >> format modifier-enabled framebuffer path. Because >> the set of format modifiers advertised by the >> kernel prior to this change do not intersect with >> the set of format modifiers advertised by Mesa, >> allocating GBM buffers using format modifiers >> fails and the modesetting driver falls back to >> non-modifier allocation. However, it still later >> queries the modifier of the GBM buffer when >> creating its DRM-KMS framebuffer object, receives >> the old-format modifier from Mesa, and attempts >> to create a framebuffer with it. Since the kernel >> is still not aware of these formats, this fails. >> >> Userspace should not be attempting to query format >> modifiers of GBM buffers allocated with a non- >> format-modifier-aware allocation path, but to >> avoid breaking existing userspace behavior, this >> change accepts the old-style format modifiers when >> creating framebuffers and applying them to planes >> by translating them to the equivalent new-style >> modifier. To accomplish this, some layout >> parameters must be assumed to match properties of >> the device targeted by the relevant ioctls. To >> avoid perpetuating misuse of the old-style >> modifiers, this change does not advertise support >> for them. Doing so would imply compatibility >> between devices with incompatible memory layouts. >> >> Tested with Xorg 1.20 modesetting driver, >> weston at c46c70dac84a4b3030cd05b380f9f410536690fc, >> gnome & KDE wayland desktops from Ubuntu 18.04, >> and sway 1.5 >> >> Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill at shutemov.name> >> Fixes: fa4f4c213f5f ("drm/nouveau/kms: Support NVIDIA format modifiers") >> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/30/1251 >> Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c >> index 496c4621cc78..31543086254b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c >> @@ -191,8 +191,14 @@ nouveau_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm, >> uint32_t *tile_mode, >> uint8_t *kind) >> { >> + struct nouveau_display *disp = nouveau_display(drm->dev); >> BUG_ON(!tile_mode || !kind); >> >> + if ((modifier & (0xffull << 12)) == 0ull) { >> + /* Legacy modifier. Translate to this device's 'kind.' */ >> + modifier |= disp->format_modifiers[0] & (0xffull << 12); >> + } > I believe this should be moved into the != MOD_LINEAR case.Yes, of course, thanks. I need to re-evaluate my testing yet again to make sure I hit that case too. Preparing a v3... Thanks, -James>> + >> if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) { >> /* tile_mode will not be used in this case */ >> *tile_mode = 0; >> @@ -227,6 +233,16 @@ nouveau_framebuffer_get_layout(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, >> } >> } >> >> +static const u64 legacy_modifiers[] = { >> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(0), >> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(1), >> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(2), >> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(3), >> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(4), >> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK(5), >> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID >> +}; >> + >> static int >> nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm, >> uint64_t modifier, >> @@ -247,8 +263,14 @@ nouveau_validate_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm, >> (disp->format_modifiers[mod] != modifier); >> mod++); >> >> - if (disp->format_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID) >> - return -EINVAL; >> + if (disp->format_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID) { >> + for (mod = 0; >> + (legacy_modifiers[mod] != DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID) && >> + (legacy_modifiers[mod] != modifier); >> + mod++); >> + if (legacy_modifiers[mod] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> >> nouveau_decode_mod(drm, modifier, tile_mode, kind); >> >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nouveau mailing list >> Nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
Dave Airlie
2020-Jul-29 02:48 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 04:51, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote:> > On 7/23/20 9:06 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:34, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote: > >> > >> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK() > >> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace > >> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa > >> drivers are still aware of only these older > >> format modifiers which do not differentiate > >> between different variations of the block linear > >> layout. When the format modifier support flag was > >> flipped in the nouveau kernel driver, the X.org > >> modesetting driver began attempting to use its > >> format modifier-enabled framebuffer path. Because > >> the set of format modifiers advertised by the > >> kernel prior to this change do not intersect with > >> the set of format modifiers advertised by Mesa, > >> allocating GBM buffers using format modifiers > >> fails and the modesetting driver falls back to > >> non-modifier allocation. However, it still later > >> queries the modifier of the GBM buffer when > >> creating its DRM-KMS framebuffer object, receives > >> the old-format modifier from Mesa, and attempts > >> to create a framebuffer with it. Since the kernel > >> is still not aware of these formats, this fails. > >> > >> Userspace should not be attempting to query format > >> modifiers of GBM buffers allocated with a non- > >> format-modifier-aware allocation path, but to > >> avoid breaking existing userspace behavior, this > >> change accepts the old-style format modifiers when > >> creating framebuffers and applying them to planes > >> by translating them to the equivalent new-style > >> modifier. To accomplish this, some layout > >> parameters must be assumed to match properties of > >> the device targeted by the relevant ioctls. To > >> avoid perpetuating misuse of the old-style > >> modifiers, this change does not advertise support > >> for them. Doing so would imply compatibility > >> between devices with incompatible memory layouts. > >> > >> Tested with Xorg 1.20 modesetting driver, > >> weston at c46c70dac84a4b3030cd05b380f9f410536690fc, > >> gnome & KDE wayland desktops from Ubuntu 18.04, > >> and sway 1.5 > >> > >> Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill at shutemov.name> > >> Fixes: fa4f4c213f5f ("drm/nouveau/kms: Support NVIDIA format modifiers") > >> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/30/1251 > >> Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-- > >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c > >> index 496c4621cc78..31543086254b 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c > >> @@ -191,8 +191,14 @@ nouveau_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm, > >> uint32_t *tile_mode, > >> uint8_t *kind) > >> { > >> + struct nouveau_display *disp = nouveau_display(drm->dev); > >> BUG_ON(!tile_mode || !kind); > >> > >> + if ((modifier & (0xffull << 12)) == 0ull) { > >> + /* Legacy modifier. Translate to this device's 'kind.' */ > >> + modifier |= disp->format_modifiers[0] & (0xffull << 12); > >> + } > > I believe this should be moved into the != MOD_LINEAR case. > > Yes, of course, thanks. I need to re-evaluate my testing yet again to > make sure I hit that case too. Preparing a v3...Going to need something here in the next day, two max. Linus may wait for another week, but it's not guaranteed. Dave.
Ben Skeggs
2020-Jul-29 03:40 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 12:48, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:> > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 04:51, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/23/20 9:06 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:34, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK() > > >> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace > > >> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa > > >> drivers are still aware of only these older > > >> format modifiers which do not differentiate > > >> between different variations of the block linear > > >> layout. When the format modifier support flag was > > >> flipped in the nouveau kernel driver, the X.org > > >> modesetting driver began attempting to use its > > >> format modifier-enabled framebuffer path. Because > > >> the set of format modifiers advertised by the > > >> kernel prior to this change do not intersect with > > >> the set of format modifiers advertised by Mesa, > > >> allocating GBM buffers using format modifiers > > >> fails and the modesetting driver falls back to > > >> non-modifier allocation. However, it still later > > >> queries the modifier of the GBM buffer when > > >> creating its DRM-KMS framebuffer object, receives > > >> the old-format modifier from Mesa, and attempts > > >> to create a framebuffer with it. Since the kernel > > >> is still not aware of these formats, this fails. > > >> > > >> Userspace should not be attempting to query format > > >> modifiers of GBM buffers allocated with a non- > > >> format-modifier-aware allocation path, but to > > >> avoid breaking existing userspace behavior, this > > >> change accepts the old-style format modifiers when > > >> creating framebuffers and applying them to planes > > >> by translating them to the equivalent new-style > > >> modifier. To accomplish this, some layout > > >> parameters must be assumed to match properties of > > >> the device targeted by the relevant ioctls. To > > >> avoid perpetuating misuse of the old-style > > >> modifiers, this change does not advertise support > > >> for them. Doing so would imply compatibility > > >> between devices with incompatible memory layouts. > > >> > > >> Tested with Xorg 1.20 modesetting driver, > > >> weston at c46c70dac84a4b3030cd05b380f9f410536690fc, > > >> gnome & KDE wayland desktops from Ubuntu 18.04, > > >> and sway 1.5 > > >> > > >> Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill at shutemov.name> > > >> Fixes: fa4f4c213f5f ("drm/nouveau/kms: Support NVIDIA format modifiers") > > >> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/30/1251 > > >> Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> > > >> --- > > >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-- > > >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c > > >> index 496c4621cc78..31543086254b 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c > > >> @@ -191,8 +191,14 @@ nouveau_decode_mod(struct nouveau_drm *drm, > > >> uint32_t *tile_mode, > > >> uint8_t *kind) > > >> { > > >> + struct nouveau_display *disp = nouveau_display(drm->dev); > > >> BUG_ON(!tile_mode || !kind); > > >> > > >> + if ((modifier & (0xffull << 12)) == 0ull) { > > >> + /* Legacy modifier. Translate to this device's 'kind.' */ > > >> + modifier |= disp->format_modifiers[0] & (0xffull << 12); > > >> + } > > > I believe this should be moved into the != MOD_LINEAR case. > > > > Yes, of course, thanks. I need to re-evaluate my testing yet again to > > make sure I hit that case too. Preparing a v3... > > Going to need something here in the next day, two max. > > Linus may wait for another week, but it's not guaranteed.I tested a whole bunch of GPUs before sending nouveau's -next tree, and with the change I suggested to this patch + the other stuff I sent through -fixes already, things seemed to be in OK shape. Ben.> > Dave.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
- [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
- [PATCH v3] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
- [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
- [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers