Nouveau - Sep 2019 - [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/ttm: use gem vma_node

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs
wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
wrote:
> >
> >   Hi,
> >
> > > > Changing the order doesn't look hard.  Patch attached
(untested, have no
> > > > test hardware).  But maybe I missed some detail ...
> > >
> > > I came up with something very similar by splitting up
nouveau_bo_new()
> > > into allocation and initialization steps, so that when necessary
the GEM
> > > object can be initialized in between. I think that's slightly
more
> > > flexible and easier to understand than a boolean flag.
> >
> > Yes, that should work too.
> >
> > Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Thanks guys, applied to drm-misc-next.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20190821/be420548/attachment.sig>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:55 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at
gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at
redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >   Hi,
> > >
> > > > > Changing the order doesn't look hard.  Patch
attached (untested, have no
> > > > > test hardware).  But maybe I missed some detail ...
> > > >
> > > > I came up with something very similar by splitting up
nouveau_bo_new()
> > > > into allocation and initialization steps, so that when
necessary the GEM
> > > > object can be initialized in between. I think that's
slightly more
> > > > flexible and easier to understand than a boolean flag.
> > >
> > > Yes, that should work too.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
>
> Thanks guys, applied to drm-misc-next.
Hi Thierry,

Initial investigations suggest that this commit currently in drm-next

commit 019cbd4a4feb3aa3a917d78e7110e3011bbff6d5
Author: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 14 11:00:48 2019 +0200

    drm/nouveau: Initialize GEM object before TTM object

breaks nouveau userspace which tries to allocate GEM objects with a
non-page-aligned size. Previously nouveau_gem_new would just call
nouveau_bo_init which would call nouveau_bo_fixup_align before
initializing the GEM object. With this change, it is done after. What
do you think -- OK to just move that bit of logic into the new
nouveau_bo_alloc() (and make size/align be pointers so that they can
be fixed up?)

Cheers,

  -ilia

On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 09:58:46PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:55 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at
gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at
redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > > Changing the order doesn't look hard.  Patch
attached (untested, have no
> > > > > > test hardware).  But maybe I missed some detail
...
> > > > >
> > > > > I came up with something very similar by splitting up
nouveau_bo_new()
> > > > > into allocation and initialization steps, so that when
necessary the GEM
> > > > > object can be initialized in between. I think
that's slightly more
> > > > > flexible and easier to understand than a boolean flag.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that should work too.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> > > Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
> >
> > Thanks guys, applied to drm-misc-next.
> 
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> Initial investigations suggest that this commit currently in drm-next
> 
> commit 019cbd4a4feb3aa3a917d78e7110e3011bbff6d5
> Author: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> Date:   Wed Aug 14 11:00:48 2019 +0200
> 
>     drm/nouveau: Initialize GEM object before TTM object
> 
> breaks nouveau userspace which tries to allocate GEM objects with a
> non-page-aligned size. Previously nouveau_gem_new would just call
> nouveau_bo_init which would call nouveau_bo_fixup_align before
> initializing the GEM object. With this change, it is done after. What
> do you think -- OK to just move that bit of logic into the new
> nouveau_bo_alloc() (and make size/align be pointers so that they can
> be fixed up?)
Hi Ilia,

sorry, got side-tracked earlier and forgot to send this out. I'll turn
this into a proper patch, but if you manage to find the time to test
this while I work out the userspace issues that are preventing me from
testing this more thoroughly, that'd be great.

Thierry

--- >8 ---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index e918b437af17..7d5ede756711 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ nouveau_bo_fixup_align(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, u32 flags,
 }
 
 struct nouveau_bo *
-nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, u32 flags, u32 tile_mode,
-		 u32 tile_flags)
+nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 *size, int *align, u32 flags,
+		 u32 tile_mode, u32 tile_flags)
 {
 	struct nouveau_drm *drm = cli->drm;
 	struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
@@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, u32
flags, u32 tile_mode,
 	struct nvif_vmm *vmm = cli->svm.cli ? &cli->svm.vmm :
&cli->vmm.vmm;
 	int i, pi = -1;
 
-	if (!size) {
-		NV_WARN(drm, "skipped size %016llx\n", size);
+	if (!*size) {
+		NV_WARN(drm, "skipped size %016llx\n", *size);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, u32
flags, u32 tile_mode,
 			pi = i;
 
 		/* Stop once the buffer is larger than the current page size. */
-		if (size >= 1ULL << vmm->page[i].shift)
+		if (*size >= 1ULL << vmm->page[i].shift)
 			break;
 	}
 
@@ -281,6 +281,8 @@ nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, u32
flags, u32 tile_mode,
 	}
 	nvbo->page = vmm->page[pi].shift;
 
+	nouveau_bo_fixup_align(nvbo, flags, align, size);
+
 	return nvbo;
 }
 
@@ -292,12 +294,11 @@ nouveau_bo_init(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, u64 size, int
align, u32 flags,
 	size_t acc_size;
 	int ret;
 
-	acc_size = ttm_bo_dma_acc_size(nvbo->bo.bdev, size, sizeof(*nvbo));
-
-	nouveau_bo_fixup_align(nvbo, flags, &align, &size);
 	nvbo->bo.mem.num_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	nouveau_bo_placement_set(nvbo, flags, 0);
 
+	acc_size = ttm_bo_dma_acc_size(nvbo->bo.bdev, size, sizeof(*nvbo));
+
 	ret = ttm_bo_init(nvbo->bo.bdev, &nvbo->bo, size, type,
 			  &nvbo->placement, align >> PAGE_SHIFT, false,
 			  acc_size, sg, robj, nouveau_bo_del_ttm);
@@ -318,7 +319,8 @@ nouveau_bo_new(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, int align,
 	struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
 	int ret;
 
-	nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(cli, size, flags, tile_mode, tile_flags);
+	nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(cli, &size, &align, flags, tile_mode,
+				tile_flags);
 	if (IS_ERR(nvbo))
 		return PTR_ERR(nvbo);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
index 62930d834fba..38f9d8350963 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ nouveau_bo_ref(struct nouveau_bo *ref, struct nouveau_bo
**pnvbo)
 extern struct ttm_bo_driver nouveau_bo_driver;
 
 void nouveau_bo_move_init(struct nouveau_drm *);
-struct nouveau_bo *nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *, u64 size, u32 flags,
-				    u32 tile_mode, u32 tile_flags);
+struct nouveau_bo *nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *, u64 *size, int
*align,
+				    u32 flags, u32 tile_mode, u32 tile_flags);
 int  nouveau_bo_init(struct nouveau_bo *, u64 size, int align, u32 flags,
 		     struct sg_table *sg, struct dma_resv *robj);
 int  nouveau_bo_new(struct nouveau_cli *, u64 size, int align, u32 flags,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
index c2bfc0591909..1bdffd714456 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ nouveau_gem_new(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, int
align, uint32_t domain,
 	if (domain & NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_COHERENT)
 		flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED;
 
-	nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(cli, size, flags, tile_mode, tile_flags);
+	nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(cli, &size, &align, flags, tile_mode,
+				tile_flags);
 	if (IS_ERR(nvbo))
 		return PTR_ERR(nvbo);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c
index 84658d434225..656c334ee7d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c
@@ -62,14 +62,15 @@ struct drm_gem_object
*nouveau_gem_prime_import_sg_table(struct drm_device *dev,
 	struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(dev);
 	struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
 	struct dma_resv *robj = attach->dmabuf->resv;
-	size_t size = attach->dmabuf->size;
+	u64 size = attach->dmabuf->size;
 	u32 flags = 0;
+	int align = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_TT;
 
 	dma_resv_lock(robj, NULL);
-	nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(&drm->client, size, flags, 0, 0);
+	nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(&drm->client, &size, &align, flags, 0,
0);
 	dma_resv_unlock(robj);
 	if (IS_ERR(nvbo))
 		return ERR_CAST(nvbo);
@@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object
*nouveau_gem_prime_import_sg_table(struct drm_device *dev,
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
-	ret = nouveau_bo_init(nvbo, size, 0, flags, sg, robj);
+	ret = nouveau_bo_init(nvbo, size, align, flags, sg, robj);
 	if (ret) {
 		nouveau_bo_ref(NULL, &nvbo);
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20190910/28f39176/attachment.sig>