Nouveau - Nov 2018 - [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:35:07PM -0800, David Miller
wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:12:26 -0700
> 
> > On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> >>> <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
> >> 
> >> I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone get offended by
reading
> >> technical comments? This is all beyond me...
> > 
> > Agree, this is insanity.
> 
> And even worse it is censorship.
It is not close to a cencorship, especially when I used RFC tag, which
essentially says that I'm not saying "please take this", right?

Can you tell how the CoC should be interpreted then? I read it through
on my plane trip with an eye glass.

Is cursing OK?

/Jarkko

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:42:33 -0800
> Can you tell how the CoC should be interpreted then?
Regardless of what I think, as others have showen the CoC explicitly
does not apply to existing code.

On 11/30/18 2:47 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:42:33 -0800
> 
>> Can you tell how the CoC should be interpreted then?
> 
> Regardless of what I think, as others have showen the CoC explicitly
> does not apply to existing code.
And with that, can we please put an end to this thread (and patchset)?

-- 
Jens Axboe