Hi everyone, Using ARRAY_SIZE improves the code readability. I used coccinelle (I made a change to the array_size.cocci file [1]) to find several places where ARRAY_SIZE could be used instead of other macros or sizeof division. I tried to divide the changes into a patch per subsystem (excepted for staging). If one of the patch should be split into several patches, let me know. In order to reduce the size of the To: and Cc: lines, each patch of the series is sent only to the maintainers and lists concerned by the patch. This cover letter is sent to every list concerned by this series. This series is based on linux-next next-20170929. Each patch has been tested by building the relevant files with W=1. This series contains the following patches: [PATCH 01/18] sound: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 02/18] tracing/filter: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 03/18] media: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 04/18] IB/mlx5: Use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 05/18] net: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 06/18] drm: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 07/18] scsi: bfa: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 08/18] ecryptfs: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 09/18] nfsd: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 10/18] orangefs: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 11/18] dm space map metadata: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 12/18] x86: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 13/18] tpm: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 14/18] ipmi: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 15/18] acpi: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 16/18] media: staging: atomisp: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 17/18] staging: rtl8723bs: use ARRAY_SIZE [PATCH 18/18] staging: rtlwifi: use ARRAY_SIZE [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/13/689
Using the ARRAY_SIZE macro improves the readability of the code. Also,
it is not always useful to use a variable to store this constant
calculated at compile time nor to re-invent the ARRAY_SIZE macro.
Found with Coccinelle with the following semantic patch:
@r depends on (org || report)@
type T;
T[] E;
position p;
@@
(
(sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(*E))
|
(sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(E[...]))
|
(sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(T))
)
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure at lse.epita.fr>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 9 +++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 9 +++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c | 9 ++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c | 7 ++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_verifier.c | 10 ++++------
6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
index dfc10b1baea0..304862e2a8a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
* OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
*
*/
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/firmware.h>
#include <drm/drmP.h>
#include "amdgpu.h"
@@ -3952,10 +3953,10 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_init_save_restore_list(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
adev->gfx.rlc.reg_list_format_size_bytes >> 2,
unique_indices,
&indices_count,
- sizeof(unique_indices) / sizeof(int),
+ ARRAY_SIZE(unique_indices),
indirect_start_offsets,
&offset_count,
- sizeof(indirect_start_offsets)/sizeof(int));
+ ARRAY_SIZE(indirect_start_offsets));
/* save and restore list */
WREG32_FIELD(RLC_SRM_CNTL, AUTO_INCR_ADDR, 1);
@@ -3977,14 +3978,14 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_init_save_restore_list(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
/* starting offsets starts */
WREG32(mmRLC_GPM_SCRATCH_ADDR,
adev->gfx.rlc.starting_offsets_start);
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(indirect_start_offsets)/sizeof(int); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(indirect_start_offsets); i++)
WREG32(mmRLC_GPM_SCRATCH_DATA,
indirect_start_offsets[i]);
/* unique indices */
temp = mmRLC_SRM_INDEX_CNTL_ADDR_0;
data = mmRLC_SRM_INDEX_CNTL_DATA_0;
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(unique_indices) / sizeof(int); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(unique_indices); i++) {
if (unique_indices[i] != 0) {
WREG32(temp + i, unique_indices[i] & 0x3FFFF);
WREG32(data + i, unique_indices[i] >> 20);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
index deeaee1457ef..180726f4f34e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
* OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
*
*/
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/firmware.h>
#include <drm/drmP.h>
#include "amdgpu.h"
@@ -1730,10 +1731,10 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_init_rlc_save_restore_list(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
adev->gfx.rlc.reg_list_format_size_bytes >> 2,
unique_indirect_regs,
&unique_indirect_reg_count,
- sizeof(unique_indirect_regs)/sizeof(int),
+ ARRAY_SIZE(unique_indirect_regs),
indirect_start_offsets,
&indirect_start_offsets_count,
- sizeof(indirect_start_offsets)/sizeof(int));
+ ARRAY_SIZE(indirect_start_offsets));
/* enable auto inc in case it is disabled */
tmp = RREG32(SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_SRM_CNTL));
@@ -1770,12 +1771,12 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_init_rlc_save_restore_list(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
/* write the starting offsets to RLC scratch ram */
WREG32(SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_GPM_SCRATCH_ADDR),
adev->gfx.rlc.starting_offsets_start);
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(indirect_start_offsets)/sizeof(int); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(indirect_start_offsets); i++)
WREG32(SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_GPM_SCRATCH_DATA),
indirect_start_offsets[i]);
/* load unique indirect regs*/
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(unique_indirect_regs)/sizeof(int); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(unique_indirect_regs); i++) {
WREG32(SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_SRM_INDEX_CNTL_ADDR_0) + i,
unique_indirect_regs[i] & 0x3FFFF);
WREG32(SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_SRM_INDEX_CNTL_DATA_0) + i,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c
index e787d376ba67..84507912be84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
#include "psb_drv.h"
#include "psb_intel_sdvo_regs.h"
#include "psb_intel_reg.h"
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
#define SDVO_TMDS_MASK (SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0 | SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1)
#define SDVO_RGB_MASK (SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB0 | SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1)
@@ -62,8 +63,6 @@ static const char *tv_format_names[] = {
"SECAM_60"
};
-#define TV_FORMAT_NUM (sizeof(tv_format_names) / sizeof(*tv_format_names))
-
struct psb_intel_sdvo {
struct gma_encoder base;
@@ -148,7 +147,7 @@ struct psb_intel_sdvo_connector {
int force_audio;
/* This contains all current supported TV format */
- u8 tv_format_supported[TV_FORMAT_NUM];
+ u8 tv_format_supported[ARRAY_SIZE(tv_format_names)];
int format_supported_num;
struct drm_property *tv_format;
@@ -1709,7 +1708,7 @@ psb_intel_sdvo_set_property(struct drm_connector
*connector,
}
if (property == psb_intel_sdvo_connector->tv_format) {
- if (val >= TV_FORMAT_NUM)
+ if (val >= ARRAY_SIZE(tv_format_names))
return -EINVAL;
if (psb_intel_sdvo->tv_format_index =@@ -2269,7 +2268,7 @@ static bool
psb_intel_sdvo_tv_create_property(struct psb_intel_sdvo *psb_intel_s
return false;
psb_intel_sdvo_connector->format_supported_num = 0;
- for (i = 0 ; i < TV_FORMAT_NUM; i++)
+ for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tv_format_names); i++)
if (format_map & (1 << i))
psb_intel_sdvo_connector->tv_format_supported[psb_intel_sdvo_connector->format_supported_num++]
= i;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c
index 02c61a1ad56a..9c6d2849c5b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
*
*/
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include "i915_drv.h"
#include "gvt.h"
#include "i915_pvinfo.h"
@@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_vgpu_types(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
*/
low_avail = gvt_aperture_sz(gvt) - HOST_LOW_GM_SIZE;
high_avail = gvt_hidden_sz(gvt) - HOST_HIGH_GM_SIZE;
- num_types = sizeof(vgpu_types) / sizeof(vgpu_types[0]);
+ num_types = ARRAY_SIZE(vgpu_types);
gvt->types = kzalloc(num_types * sizeof(struct intel_vgpu_type),
GFP_KERNEL);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c
index b58ee99f7bfc..9cc10e438b3d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
#include <subdev/i2c.h>
#include <subdev/vga.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+
#define bioslog(lvl, fmt, args...) do {
\
nvkm_printk(init->subdev, lvl, info, "0x%08x[%c]: "fmt,
\
init->offset, init_exec(init) ? \
@@ -2271,8 +2273,6 @@ static struct nvbios_init_opcode {
[0xaa] = { init_reserved },
};
-#define init_opcode_nr (sizeof(init_opcode) / sizeof(init_opcode[0]))
-
int
nvbios_exec(struct nvbios_init *init)
{
@@ -2281,7 +2281,8 @@ nvbios_exec(struct nvbios_init *init)
init->nested++;
while (init->offset) {
u8 opcode = nvbios_rd08(bios, init->offset);
- if (opcode >= init_opcode_nr || !init_opcode[opcode].exec) {
+ if (opcode >= ARRAY_SIZE(init_opcode) ||
+ !init_opcode[opcode].exec) {
error("unknown opcode 0x%02x\n", opcode);
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_verifier.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_verifier.c
index 0677bbf4ec7e..fb2609434df7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_verifier.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_verifier.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <drm/drm_legacy.h>
#include "via_verifier.h"
#include "via_drv.h"
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
typedef enum {
state_command,
@@ -1102,10 +1103,7 @@ setup_hazard_table(hz_init_t init_table[], hazard_t
table[], int size)
void via_init_command_verifier(void)
{
- setup_hazard_table(init_table1, table1,
- sizeof(init_table1) / sizeof(hz_init_t));
- setup_hazard_table(init_table2, table2,
- sizeof(init_table2) / sizeof(hz_init_t));
- setup_hazard_table(init_table3, table3,
- sizeof(init_table3) / sizeof(hz_init_t));
+ setup_hazard_table(init_table1, table1, ARRAY_SIZE(init_table1));
+ setup_hazard_table(init_table2, table2, ARRAY_SIZE(init_table2));
+ setup_hazard_table(init_table3, table3, ARRAY_SIZE(init_table3));
}
--
2.14.1
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 03:30:38PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:> Hi everyone, > Using ARRAY_SIZE improves the code readability. I used coccinelle (I > made a change to the array_size.cocci file [1]) to find several places > where ARRAY_SIZE could be used instead of other macros or sizeof > division. > > I tried to divide the changes into a patch per subsystem (excepted for > staging). If one of the patch should be split into several patches, let > me know. > > In order to reduce the size of the To: and Cc: lines, each patch of the > series is sent only to the maintainers and lists concerned by the patch. > This cover letter is sent to every list concerned by this series.Why don't you just send individual patches for each subsystem? I'm not a maintainer but I don't see how any one person is going to be able to apply this whole series, it is making it hard for maintainers if they have to pick patches out from among the series (if indeed any will bother doing that). I get that this will be more work for you but AFAIK we are optimizing for maintainers. Good luck, Tobin.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:01:31 +1100 "Tobin C. Harding" <me at tobin.cc> wrote:> > In order to reduce the size of the To: and Cc: lines, each patch of the > > series is sent only to the maintainers and lists concerned by the patch. > > This cover letter is sent to every list concerned by this series. > > Why don't you just send individual patches for each subsystem? I'm not a maintainer but I don't see > how any one person is going to be able to apply this whole series, it is making it hard for > maintainers if they have to pick patches out from among the series (if indeed any will bother > doing that).Yeah, maybe it would have been better to send individual patches. From my point of view it's a series because the patches are related (I did a git format-patch from my local branch). But for the maintainers point of view, they are individual patches. As each patch in this series is standalone, the maintainers can pick the patches they want and apply them individually. So yeah, maybe I should have sent individual patches. But I also wanted to tie all patches together as it's the same change. Anyway, I can tell to each maintainer that they can apply the patches they're concerned about and next time I may send individual patches. Thank you for your answer, Jérémy
On Sun, 01 Oct 2017, Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure at lse.epita.fr> wrote:> Using the ARRAY_SIZE macro improves the readability of the code. Also, > it is not always useful to use a variable to store this constant > calculated at compile time nor to re-invent the ARRAY_SIZE macro. > > Found with Coccinelle with the following semantic patch: > @r depends on (org || report)@ > type T; > T[] E; > position p; > @@ > ( > (sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(*E)) > | > (sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(E[...])) > | > (sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(T)) > ) > > Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure at lse.epita.fr>Please split this up. Patch 1:> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 9 +++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 9 +++++----Patch 2:> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c | 9 ++++-----Patch 3:> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c | 3 ++-Patch 4:> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c | 7 ++++---Patch 5:> drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_verifier.c | 10 ++++------BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 03:30:44PM -0400, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:> Using the ARRAY_SIZE macro improves the readability of the code. Also, > it is not always useful to use a variable to store this constant > calculated at compile time nor to re-invent the ARRAY_SIZE macro. > > Found with Coccinelle with the following semantic patch: > @r depends on (org || report)@ > type T; > T[] E; > position p; > @@ > ( > (sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(*E)) > | > (sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(E[...])) > | > (sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(T)) > ) > > Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure at lse.epita.fr> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 9 +++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 9 +++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_intel_sdvo.c | 9 ++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c | 3 ++- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c | 7 ++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_verifier.c | 10 ++++------ > 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20171002/d2dc12f2/attachment.sig>
Thanks for the patch! :) 2017-10-01 22:30 GMT+03:00 Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure at lse.epita.fr>:> Hi everyone, > Using ARRAY_SIZE improves the code readability. I used coccinelle (I > made a change to the array_size.cocci file [1]) to find several places > where ARRAY_SIZE could be used instead of other macros or sizeof > division. > > I tried to divide the changes into a patch per subsystem (excepted for > staging). If one of the patch should be split into several patches, let > me know. > > In order to reduce the size of the To: and Cc: lines, each patch of the > series is sent only to the maintainers and lists concerned by the patch. > This cover letter is sent to every list concerned by this series. > > This series is based on linux-next next-20170929. Each patch has been > tested by building the relevant files with W=1. > > This series contains the following patches: > [PATCH 01/18] sound: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 02/18] tracing/filter: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 03/18] media: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 04/18] IB/mlx5: Use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 05/18] net: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 06/18] drm: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 07/18] scsi: bfa: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 08/18] ecryptfs: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 09/18] nfsd: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 10/18] orangefs: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 11/18] dm space map metadata: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 12/18] x86: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 13/18] tpm: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 14/18] ipmi: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 15/18] acpi: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 16/18] media: staging: atomisp: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 17/18] staging: rtl8723bs: use ARRAY_SIZE > [PATCH 18/18] staging: rtlwifi: use ARRAY_SIZE > > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/13/689 > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20171002/e783c6fe/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH 00/18] use ARRAY_SIZE macro
- [PATCH] drm: Don't pass the index to drm_property_add_enum()
- [PATCH] drm: Don't pass the index to drm_property_add_enum()
- [PATCH] drm: Don't pass the index to drm_property_add_enum()
- [PATCH v2 1/2] compiler-gcc.h: add gnu_inline to all inline declarations