Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "indirect_start_offset".
Did you mean:
indirect_start_offsets
2017 Oct 01
0
[PATCH 06/18] drm: use ARRAY_SIZE
...t;amdgpu.h"
@@ -3952,10 +3953,10 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_init_save_restore_list(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
adev->gfx.rlc.reg_list_format_size_bytes >> 2,
unique_indices,
&indices_count,
- sizeof(unique_indices) / sizeof(int),
+ ARRAY_SIZE(unique_indices),
indirect_start_offsets,
&offset_count,
- sizeof(indirect_start_offsets)/sizeof(int));
+ ARRAY_SIZE(indirect_start_offsets));
/* save and restore list */
WREG32_FIELD(RLC_SRM_CNTL, AUTO_INCR_ADDR, 1);
@@ -3977,14 +3978,14 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_init_save_restore_list(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
/*...
2017 Oct 01
6
[PATCH 00/18] use ARRAY_SIZE macro
Hi everyone,
Using ARRAY_SIZE improves the code readability. I used coccinelle (I
made a change to the array_size.cocci file [1]) to find several places
where ARRAY_SIZE could be used instead of other macros or sizeof
division.
I tried to divide the changes into a patch per subsystem (excepted for
staging). If one of the patch should be split into several patches, let
me know.
In order to reduce