bugzilla-daemon@netfilter.org
2003-May-31 21:25 UTC
[Bug 95] inverse limit match doesn't work
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-05-31 23:25 ------- I can confirm this bug. neither libipt_limit.c nor ipt_limit.c contain any handling of inversion. Together with Bug #94, I think it's time to rewrite parts of the limit match in order to address those issues. I doubt this will be possible without any changes to the structure matchinfo size :( ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
bugzilla-daemon@netfilter.org
2003-Jun-02 13:44 UTC
[Bug 95] inverse limit match doesn't work
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From email@cs-ware.de 2003-06-02 15:35 ------- Created an attachment (id=26) adds inverse limit matching to the iptables-module (libipt_limit.c) and kernel (works for me) ------- Additional Comments From email@cs-ware.de 2003-06-02 15:44 ------- I wrote a small patch (attachment 26) to add inverse matching to iptables (v1.2.8; libipt_limit.c) and kernel (v2.4.20; ipt_limit.h and ipt_limit.c). I've tested it locally and it works for me. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.