search for: ipt_limit

...Used by Not tainted ip_conntrack_ftp 4272 0 (unused) iptable_nat 17468 0 (autoclean) (unused) ipt_state 568 3 (autoclean) ip_conntrack 20616 3 (autoclean) [ip_conntrack_ftp iptable_nat ipt_state] ipt_LOG 3352 1 (autoclean) ipt_limit 1016 1 (autoclean) iptable_filter 1708 1 (autoclean) ip_tables 12408 7 [iptable_nat ipt_state ipt_LOG ipt_limit iptable_filter] ...... any idea why it doesn work... passive-ftp is ok. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /...

...3456 0 (autoclean) sch_htb 19040 0 (autoclean) ipt_ttl 640 0 (autoclean) ipt_state 608 0 (autoclean) ipt_REJECT 3072 0 (autoclean) ipt_connlimit 1504 0 (autoclean) ipt_LOG 3648 0 (autoclean) ipt_limit 960 0 (autoclean) iptable_filter 1728 0 (autoclean) ipt_mac 672 15 (autoclean) ipt_helper 992 22 (autoclean) ipt_multiport 640 132 (autoclean) ipt_MARK 800 255 (autoclean) iptable_mangle 2208 1...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-05-31 23:25 ------- I can confirm this bug. neither libipt_limit.c nor ipt_limit.c contain any handling of inversion. Together with Bug #94, I think it's time to rewrite parts of the limit match in order to address those issues. I doubt this will be possible without any changes to the structure matchinfo size :( ------- You are receiving this mail beca...

Does anyone keep a known telemarketer caller id database? If not has anyone proposed an Asterisk community project to share this information? Sort of a nation wide blacklist so Asterisk'ers can cut down on the garbage calls... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...utoclean) cls_fw 3512 0 (autoclean) sch_sfq 4096 0 (autoclean) sch_htb 22176 0 ipt_MARK 1368 2 (autoclean) ip_nat_ftp 4112 0 (unused) ip_conntrack_ftp 5296 1 ipt_state 1080 0 (unused) ipt_limit 1560 0 (unused) ipt_LOG 4184 0 (unused) iptable_nat 21752 2 [ip_nat_ftp] iptable_mangle 2776 1 iptable_filter 2412 1 ip_conntrack 27304 3 [ip_nat_ftp ip_conntrack_ftp ipt_state iptable_nat] ip_tables 1...

...3872 0 (unused) > 8021q 15176 3 > ne2k-pci 6240 1 > 8390 7812 0 [ne2k-pci] > 3c59x 28008 4 > ipt_multiport 1184 52 (autoclean) > ipt_LOG 4160 18 (autoclean) > ipt_limit 1568 13 (autoclean) > ipt_state 1088 20 (autoclean) > iptable_mangle 2688 0 (autoclean) (unused) > iptable_nat 18484 2 (autoclean) [ip_nat_ftp] > ip_conntrack 19596 3 (autoclean) [ip_conntrack_ftp ip_nat_ftp > ipt...

Hi, ok Im all new to this :-) for pasv ftp in your example you say for example to use ports 65500-65535, but i dont see that u open those ports in your example fw scripts..? any hints ? -- Christophe Zwecker mail: doc@zwecker.de Hamburg, Germany fon: +49 179 3994867 http://www.zwecker.de "Who is General Failure ? And why is he reading my disk

...at kind these oopses are I quote the last two. The symptom is that the machine stops responding but is pingable. After a reset all is well until the next crash in ten days or so. Apr 29 15:05:07 nx05 kernel: c014802d Apr 29 15:05:07 nx05 kernel: Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs smbfs ipt_REJECT ipt_limit ipt_state ipt_LOG iptable_filter ip_tables ip_conntrack_ftp ip_conntrack md5 ipv6 autofs4 sunrpc dm_mirror dm_mod button battery ac 8139too mii ext3 jbd ata_piix libata sd_mod scsi_mod Apr 29 15:05:07 nx05 kernel: CPU: 0 Apr 29 15:05:07 nx05 kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c014802d>] Not taint...

...2144 1 ipt_ttl 640 0 (unused) ipt_tos 480 0 (unused) ipt_tcpmss 928 0 (unused) ipt_multiport 640 0 ipt_mark 480 0 (unused) ipt_mac 672 0 (unused) ipt_state 608 30 ipt_limit 960 0 (unused) ipt_unclean 6784 0 (unused) iptable_filter 1728 1 ipt_length 512 0 (unused) ipt_TOS 1024 12 ipt_TCPMSS 2368 0 (unused) ipt_REJECT 2784 4 ipt_REDIRECT 736 0 (unu...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-20 10:55 ------- This looks strange. The BUG in slab.c tells us that there is a GFP_ATOMIC missing. This means that we are allocating kernel memory from softirq context with only GFP_KERNEL. If I understand your backtrace correctly, what happens is: - you are

...> > Kernel 2.6.15-rc6 OOPS: > > kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] > kernel: SMP > kernel: Modules linked in: ipt_REDIRECT ipt_LOG ipt_TOS ipt_TCPMSS ipt_tos > ip_nat_ftp ipt_tcpmss iptable_nat ip_nat iptable_mangle iptable_filter > ipt_multiport ipt_mac ipt_state ipt_limit ipt_conntrack ip_conntrack_ftp > ip_conntrack ip_tables af_packet ipv6 pcspkr floppy i2c_piix4 i2c_core > ohci_hcd usbcore aic7xxx scsi_transport_spi psmouse ide_disk ide_cd > cdrom genrtc > kernel: CPU: 0 > kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c019d70f>] Not tainted VLI > kernel...

...------------------------------ Severity|major |normal Component|netfilter hooks |ip_tables (kernel) ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-05-31 23:21 ------- Yes, this is a known issue. The reason is that the author of ipt_limit.c stores a pointer (master) inside the matchinfo structure. That pointer is 64bit in the kernel and 32bit in userspace, this is why the structure sizes differ and you receive an invalid argument error. This is not an excuse, I'm just trying to explain what's going on - maybe somebody else...

...onfiguration verified > > > I have all iptables modules (that supported by OpenVZ) installed, > loaded and working but under virtual > server its are invisible (if i correct understand). This is parameter in > vz.conf: > > IPTABLES="iptable_filter iptable_mangle ipt_limit ipt_multiport ipt_tos > ipt_TOS ipt_REJECT ipt_TCPMSS ipt_tcpmss ipt_ttl ipt_LOG ipt_length > ip_conntrack ipt_state ipt_helper iptable_nat ip_nat_ftp ip_nat_irc > ipt_REDIRECT xt_mac" > > On the host node all OK: > > vserver1 / # shorewall check > Checking......

...nsaction+2594} Jan 23 03:08:22 infinity kernel: [24686.841064] PGD 6ea20067 PUD 6ea97067 PMD 0 Jan 23 03:08:22 infinity kernel: [24686.841069] Oops: 0000 [1] SMP Jan 23 03:08:22 infinity kernel: [24686.841073] CPU 1 Jan 23 03:08:22 infinity kernel: [24686.841075] Modules linked in: ext2 binfmt_misc ipt_limit iptable_mangle ipt_LOG ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat ipt_TOS ipt_REJECT ip_conntrack_irc ip_conntrack_ftp ipt_state ip_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables ipv6 pcspkr snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_via82xx gameport snd_ac97_codec snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi snd_se...

...tp.o ipt_helper.o ipt_owner.o ipt_tos.o ip_nat_h323.o ipt_IMQ.o ipt_pkttype.o ipt_TOS.o ip_nat_irc.o ipt_ipv4options.o ipt_pool.o ipt_ttl.o ip_nat_snmp_basic.o ipt_length.o ipt_POOL.o ipt_TTL.o ip_pool.o ipt_limit.o ipt_psd.o ipt_ULOG.o ip_queue.o ipt_LOG.o ipt_realm.o ipt_unclean.o iptable_filter.o ipt_mac.o ipt_recent.o iptable_mangle.o ipt_mark.o ipt_record_rpc.o [root@cab1 root]# [root@cab1 root]# tc -V tc utility, iproute2-ss010824...

...# ls /lib/modules/2.6.5/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ ip_conntrack.ko ip_nat_ftp.ko ipt_MASQUERADE.ko ipt_SAME.ko ipt_ecn.ko ipt_length.ko ipt_multiport.ko ipt_state.ko iptable_filter.ko ip_conntrack_ftp.ko ip_nat_irc.ko ipt_NETMAP.ko ipt_ah.ko ipt_esp.ko ipt_limit.ko ipt_owner.ko ipt_tcpmss.ko iptable_mangle.ko ip_conntrack_irc.ko ip_nat_tftp.ko ipt_REDIRECT.ko ipt_conntrack.ko ipt_helper.ko ipt_mac.ko ipt_pkttype.ko ipt_tos.ko iptable_nat.ko ip_conntrack_tftp.ko ip_tables.ko ipt_REJECT.ko ipt_dscp.ko ipt_iprange.ko...

...: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 8f38df23 Dec 10 10:30:01 nx10 kernel: printing eip: Dec 10 10:30:01 nx10 kernel: c019190b Dec 10 10:30:01 nx10 kernel: *pde = 00000000 Dec 10 10:30:01 nx10 kernel: Oops: 0000 [#1] Dec 10 10:30:01 nx10 kernel: Modules linked in: ipt_REJECT ipt_limit ipt_state ipt_LOG iptable_filter ip_tables ip_conntrack_ftp ip_conntrack md5 ipv6 autofs4 i2c_dev i2c_core sunrpc dm_mirror dm_mod button battery ac 8139too mii ext3 jbd ata_piix libata sd_mod scsi_mod Dec 10 10:30:01 nx10 kernel: CPU: 0 Dec 10 10:30:01 nx10 kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c019190b&...

I''m very new to shorewall. My setup is IP Gateway (CentOS 4 + Shorewall) with 3 NIC cards. Shorewall works great on the firewall machine. Bind also works (local net machines get IPs fine). Under firestarter, all works great. With shorewall, the loc machines can not route past the firewall. They can connect to the firewall, but not past it. Exactly what information should I post to get

...ip_nat_ftp ip_conntrack_ftp binfmt_misc binfmt_aout raw ppp_deflate zlib_deflate bsd_comp ppp_async crc_ccitt ppp_gen eric slhc eepro100 eth1394 bridge atm cls_fw cls_u32 sch_sfq sch_htb af_packet ip6t_limit ip6t_LOG ip6t_mac ip6t_MARK ip6tab le_mangle ip6table_filter ip6_tables md5 ipv6 ipt_TARPIT ipt_limit ipt_REJECT ipt_LOG ipt_mac ipt_mark ipt_MASQUERADE iptabl e_nat ipt_owner ipt_MARK ipt_state ip_conntrack iptable_mangle iptable_filter ip_tables tsdev psmouse parport_pc parport evd ev floppy pcspkr sundance mii crc32 ohci1394 ieee1394 snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm...

Hi all, Can anybody tell me that wether I should install DIGIUM-TE120P card on redhat9.0 2.4.20-8 or 2.6.18 kernel. I am using kernel 2.6.18 but facing a very serious problem of modutils and iptable. Can anybody help me out. Thanx and Regards sanchal singh