Markdown Discuss - Nov 2010 - File Extension Consensus

I see in the archives that using a common extension for markdown has been
discussed. Has an official consensus ever been reached?

Thanks

--
Brett

I don't think you can find any "official body" that would be able
to
say anything :)

Short answer: not that I know of.

I use either '.markdown' or '.txt'

- jem

>    why do we need a "standard" anyway?
for the same reason any file "needs" a descriptive extension --
so the humans will know something about that file's contents...

in this case, the need-to-know is that the file can be displayed
in a more esoteric and pleasing way if the human desires that...

and i would also suspect, at this time when the ordinary person
is totally unaware of markdown and its benefits, that consistent
use of an extension might well serve to prod the curiosity of the
more curious of the species, and thus help to spread the word...

myself, i'd be satisfied if our computers would auto-recognize 
any markdown files and render them in the sophisticated style.

but it seems we've crippled our computers by making them so
dumb that they, too, rely on file-extensions, almost completely.

-bowerbird
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20101107/3c37367b/attachment.html>