godspeed, steve. thanks for giving us the tools to catch fish. -bowerbird -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20111006/3e1c11bd/attachment.htm>
Thanks for the spam. On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:39 AM, <Bowerbird at aol.com> wrote:> godspeed, steve. thanks for giving us the tools to catch fish. > > -bowerbird > > _______________________________________________ > Markdown-Discuss mailing list > Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20111006/003dc40d/attachment.html>
He always writes like this. Cheers, Wander On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 09:22, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 at gmail.com> wrote:> Thanks for the spam. > > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:39 AM, <Bowerbird at aol.com> wrote: > >> godspeed, steve. thanks for giving us the tools to catch fish. >> >> -bowerbird >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Markdown-Discuss mailing list >> Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Markdown-Discuss mailing list > Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20111006/ee9226ca/attachment.html>
christian sciberras said:> spami'm guessing that you did not _intend_ for that to sound quite that insensitive, so i'll choose not to interpret it that way. you probably were trying, in your own way, as clumsy as it may be, just to encourage me to "get back on-topic", which i would assume means to post about markdown, even though the so-called "inventor" of markdown, gruber, would be the first to tell you that if it wasn't for steve jobs, he'd likely be in another line of work. so i'd think your definition of "on-topic" is narrow. but nonetheless, fine. i'd like a little recovery-time, so i won't discuss it right now, but i can point y'all to an interesting article, by joe hewitt, where he discusses how he uses markdown with dropbox to handle his blog.> http://static.joehewitt.com/2011/10/03/dropbox-is-my-publish-buttoni will indeed want to discuss this article sometime later, so christian, if you want to go read it, and start the discussion, please feel free to contribute to the list in a meaningful way, instead of whining, so -- in contrast to death from cancer -- nobody has to wonder if you are really that insensitive or not. -bowerbird -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20111006/55c27ec7/attachment.html>
christian sciberras said:> inappropriateand i would expect that you did not "intend" for that to sound quite so insensitive either; still, you are making it increasingly difficult for me to choose not to interpret it that way. -bowerbird -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20111006/37ad64d8/attachment.html>
* Bowerbird at aol.com <Bowerbird at aol.com> [2011-10-06 18:40]:> christian sciberras said: > > inappropriate > > and i would expect that you did not "intend" for that to sound quite > so insensitive either; still, you are making it increasingly difficult > for me to choose not to interpret it that way.Do interpret it that way.