Yeah, I don't see why any of these should be set to high. We can start with
them at at medium at least. Objections?
-Todd
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:15:55PM +0200, maks attems
wrote:> hello,
>
> logcheck is currently using priority "high" for all of its
templates.
> Can't imagine that to be a fine-grained choice.
>
> according to a quick `grep -r db_text debian/` we have 5 entries,
> a first proposal for discussion:
> medium for msgid "Changing the report level or email address."
> medium for msgid "Changes to ignore.d directory behaviour"
> low for msgid "Local modifications should be put into .d
directories"
> low for msgid "Logcheck standard rulefiles renamed"
> medium for msgid "Delete obsolete conffiles"
>
>
> thanks for your ideas,
> hope that this can still go in next release.
> a++ maks
>
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `'
`- ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20040512/22821d62/attachment.pgp