George Rimar via llvm-dev
2018-Mar-21 08:04 UTC
[llvm-dev] [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
>I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld.> >Cheers, >RafaelOk. Should we give an error when .note.gnu.property section is in the object?? ?Best regards, George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180321/76b1852c/attachment.html>
Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
2018-Mar-22 21:58 UTC
[llvm-dev] [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
I'd think we shouldn't do anything even for printing out a warning unless doing it is proved to be useful. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:04 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote:> >I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these > features with lld. > > > >Cheers, > >Rafael > > Ok. Should we give an error when .note.gnu.property section is in the > object? > > Best regards, > George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180322/8aa43266/attachment.html>
George Rimar via llvm-dev
2018-Apr-30 16:01 UTC
[llvm-dev] [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
Just in case, a little update for this thread: There was a talk about "Protecting the code: Control Flow Enforcement Technology" during the recent llvm-dev meeting (https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/talks.html#Talk_17). It was mentioned that some support is already implemented in LLVM. I did not have chance to look close on it though. Whole feature requires linker side support, current status: bfd support this, gold - still does not. I would love to see some comments from O. Simhon? in this thread probably. Best regards, George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc ________________________________ От: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> Отправлено: 23 марта 2018 г. 0:58 Кому: George Rimar Копия: rafael at espindo.la; llvm-dev Тема: Re: [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ? I'd think we shouldn't do anything even for printing out a warning unless doing it is proved to be useful. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:04 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com<mailto:grimar at accesssoftek.com>> wrote:>I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld.> >Cheers, >RafaelOk. Should we give an error when .note.gnu.property section is in the object?? ?Best regards, George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180430/19888b29/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
- [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
- [RFC] - Deduplication of debug information in linkers (LLD).
- [RFC] Making .eh_frame more linker-friendly
- Collecting address ranges in DWARFUnit::collectAddressRanges.