Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "espindo".
2018 Mar 22
0
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
I'd think we shouldn't do anything even for printing out a warning unless
doing it is proved to be useful.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:04 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com>
wrote:
> >I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these
> features with lld.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Rafael
>
> Ok. Should we give an error when
2018 Apr 30
0
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
...old - still does not.
I would love to see some comments from O. Simhon? in this thread probably.
Best regards,
George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc
________________________________
От: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>
Отправлено: 23 марта 2018 г. 0:58
Кому: George Rimar
Копия: rafael at espindo.la; llvm-dev
Тема: Re: [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
I'd think we shouldn't do anything even for printing out a warning unless doing it is proved to be useful.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:04 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com<mai...
2018 Mar 21
2
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
>I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld.
>
>Cheers,
>Rafael
Ok. Should we give an error when .note.gnu.property section is in the object??
?Best regards,
George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2018 Mar 20
0
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld.
Cheers,
Rafael
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On March 20, 2018 6:59 AM, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
> Linux GABI [1] introduced new .note.gnu.property section which contains a program
> property note which describes special handling requirements for linker and run-time
2018 Mar 20
3
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
Linux GABI [1] introduced new .note.gnu.property section which contains a program
property note which describes special handling requirements for linker and run-time loader.
LLD does not support .note.gnu.property yet.
GABI specifies 2 types of entries:
GNU_PROPERTY_STACK_SIZE and GNU_PROPERTY_NO_COPY_ON_PROTECTED:
* GNU_PROPERTY_STACK_SIZE: Its pr_data field contains an integer in the format