search for: talk_17

I'd think we shouldn't do anything even for printing out a warning unless doing it is proved to be useful. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:04 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > >I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these > features with lld. > > > >Cheers, > >Rafael > > Ok. Should we give an error when

Just in case, a little update for this thread: There was a talk about "Protecting the code: Control Flow Enforcement Technology" during the recent llvm-dev meeting (https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/talks.html#Talk_17). It was mentioned that some support is already implemented in LLVM. I did not have chance to look close on it though. Whole feature requires linker side support, current status: bfd support this, gold - still does not. I would love to see some comments from O. Simhon? in this thread probably....

>I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld. > >Cheers, >Rafael Ok. Should we give an error when .note.gnu.property section is in the object?? ?Best regards, George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: