Is anyone aware of what the status of the LLVM PGI Fortran front-end is? The last I've seen any information on this mailing list is about a year ago, and the original mailing list message suggested that it would be made public in late 2016. -- Joshua Cranmer Source code archæologist
Didn't you see Hal's reply? He keeps saying that they will announce something. I expect it will likely be timed around ISC17 or SC17 if it will be this year. Frankly I'm more than disappointed about the lack of transparency. Hal talked about people having concerns over how "open source" Intel was about their OMP runtime, but this is way beyond that. A **** press release and no code for over a year?! Is that *really* how the open source process works? All that did was derail legitimate efforts on a real Flang.>From the slides I've seen there's going to be a "PGI IR" between "Flang"and llvm ir I guess. If that's really the case then I'm curious if this is using a similar approach to what others have publicly worked already. btw if you zoom in on the rather useless slides that are floating around - you'd see that ThePortlandGroup/Flang github project was showing little recent activity. I'll let others get their tinfoil hats to speculate further.. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Joshua Cranmer via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Is anyone aware of what the status of the LLVM PGI Fortran front-end is? > The last I've seen any information on this mailing list is about a year > ago, and the original mailing list message suggested that it would be made > public in late 2016. > > -- > Joshua Cranmer > Source code archæologist > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170518/67812283/attachment.html>
> Didn't you see Hal's reply?Hi Chris, Given that the email is *exactly* the same as yesterday’s I’d rather bet on a technical reason here. So probably no intention by Joshua ;-) Regards Jonas From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of C Bergström via llvm-dev Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 8:27 AM To: Joshua Cranmer <cranmer2 at illinois.edu> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLVM Fortran front-end Didn't you see Hal's reply? He keeps saying that they will announce something. I expect it will likely be timed around ISC17 or SC17 if it will be this year. Frankly I'm more than disappointed about the lack of transparency. Hal talked about people having concerns over how "open source" Intel was about their OMP runtime, but this is way beyond that. A **** press release and no code for over a year?! Is that *really* how the open source process works? All that did was derail legitimate efforts on a real Flang.>From the slides I've seen there's going to be a "PGI IR" between "Flang" and llvm ir I guess. If that's really the case then I'm curious if this is using a similar approach to what others have publicly worked already.btw if you zoom in on the rather useless slides that are floating around - you'd see that ThePortlandGroup/Flang github project was showing little recent activity. I'll let others get their tinfoil hats to speculate further.. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Joshua Cranmer via llvm-dev < <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: Is anyone aware of what the status of the LLVM PGI Fortran front-end is? The last I've seen any information on this mailing list is about a year ago, and the original mailing list message suggested that it would be made public in late 2016. -- Joshua Cranmer Source code archæologist _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170518/87083d17/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5792 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170518/87083d17/attachment.bin>
No official announcement yet, but looks like the code is now live: https://github.com/flang-compiler/flang <https://github.com/flang-compiler/flang> James> On 16 May 2017, at 17:15, Joshua Cranmer via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Is anyone aware of what the status of the LLVM PGI Fortran front-end is? The last I've seen any information on this mailing list is about a year ago, and the original mailing list message suggested that it would be made public in late 2016. > > -- > Joshua Cranmer > Source code archæologist > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170518/8b408c84/attachment.html>
On 18 May 2017 at 05:22, James Price via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> No official announcement yet, but looks like the code is now live: > > https://github.com/flang-compiler/flangI just love this option: -Mextened Allow source lines up to 132 characters Not only are long lines an extension, even that only gets you 132 characters. Punch cards forever! Tim.