Dasgupta, Sandeep via llvm-dev
2016-Nov-28 02:21 UTC
[llvm-dev] LLVM Pass for Instructions in Function (error
Hi, Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Gurunath Kadam via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Date: 11/27/2016 7:49 PM (GMT-06:00) To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [llvm-dev] LLVM Pass for Instructions in Function (error Hi, Please find the embedded code. Also you may follow http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#iterating-over-the-instruction-in-a-function - Sandeep I have following lines in my code, where I need to iterate over the instructions in the function (not BB): for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I){ Instruction *Inst = I; Instruction *Inst = &*I; if (Inst -> getOpcode() == Instruction::GetElementPtr){ Value* AddrPointer = Inst->getIperand(0); .... if (cast<Operator>(Inst) -> getOpcode() == Instruction::GetElementPtr){ Value* AddrPointer = cast<Value>(Inst); Value* threadId = Inst -> getOperand(1); unsigned AddrSpace = Inst -> getAddressSpace() DataStructureForTrace.push_back (std:make_tuple(new Value(threadId), AddrSpace, 0, new Value(AddrPointer))); } } I get following error (there are more, some visible here and some not. for eg, getAddressSpace not being for Instruction class.): error: cannot convert ‘llvm::inst_iterator {aka llvm::InstIterator<llvm::SymbolTableList<llvm::BasicBlock>, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<llvm::BasicBlock, false, false, void>, false, false>, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<llvm::Instruction, false, false, void>, false, false>, llvm::Instruction>}’ to ‘llvm::Instruction*’ in initialization Instruction *Inst = I; I am not sure about this, as I am following some online code practices. Thank you. Regards, Gurunath -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161128/31d6580b/attachment.html>
Gurunath Kadam via llvm-dev
2016-Nov-28 02:40 UTC
[llvm-dev] LLVM Pass for Instructions in Function (error
Hi Sandeep, Thanks. One question about: Value* AddrPointer = Inst->getIperand(0); So this works for LVALUE(S) i.e. in my case pointer on LHS of '='. I cannot find anything online about getloperand online. For reference this is the instruction: %ptrA = getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %A, i32 %id I thought if I just get the return value of the instruction then I can get %ptrA. Can you please elaborate on that? Thanks again. -Gurunath On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Dasgupta, Sandeep <sdasgup3 at illinois.edu> wrote:> Hi, > > > > > Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Gurunath Kadam via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Date: 11/27/2016 7:49 PM (GMT-06:00) > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: [llvm-dev] LLVM Pass for Instructions in Function (error > > Hi, > > Please find the embedded code. Also you may follow > http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#iterating-over-the- > instruction-in-a-function > - > Sandeep > > I have following lines in my code, where I need to iterate over the > instructions in the function (not BB): > > for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I){ > Instruction *Inst = I; > > Instruction *Inst = &*I; > if (Inst -> getOpcode() == Instruction::GetElementPtr){ > Value* AddrPointer = Inst->getIperand(0); > .... > > if (cast<Operator>(Inst) -> getOpcode() == Instruction::GetElementPtr){ > Value* AddrPointer = cast<Value>(Inst); > Value* threadId = Inst -> getOperand(1); > unsigned AddrSpace = Inst -> getAddressSpace() > DataStructureForTrace.push_back (std:make_tuple(new > Value(threadId), AddrSpace, 0, new Value(AddrPointer))); > } > } > > I get following error (there are more, some visible here and some not. for > eg, getAddressSpace not being for Instruction class.): > > error: cannot convert ‘llvm::inst_iterator {aka llvm::InstIterator<llvm:: > SymbolTableList<llvm::BasicBlock>, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm:: > ilist_detail::node_options<llvm::BasicBlock, false, false, void>, false, > false>, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<llvm::Instruction, > false, false, void>, false, false>, llvm::Instruction>}’ to > ‘llvm::Instruction*’ in initialization > Instruction *Inst = I; > > I am not sure about this, as I am following some online code practices. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Gurunath >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161127/a6a40a67/attachment.html>
Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev
2016-Nov-28 04:04 UTC
[llvm-dev] LLVM Pass for Instructions in Function (error
> On Nov 27, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Gurunath Kadam via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Sandeep, > > Thanks. > > One question about: > > Value* AddrPointer = Inst->getIperand(0); > > So this works for LVALUE(S) i.e. in my case pointer on LHS of '='. I cannot find anything online about getloperand online. > > For reference this is the instruction: > > %ptrA = getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %A, i32 %id > > I thought if I just get the return value of the instruction then I can get %ptrA.%ptrA is not the return value of the instruction, it *is* the instruction itself. — Mehdi> > Can you please elaborate on that? > > Thanks again. > > -Gurunath > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Dasgupta, Sandeep <sdasgup3 at illinois.edu <mailto:sdasgup3 at illinois.edu>> wrote: > Hi, > > > > > Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Gurunath Kadam via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > Date: 11/27/2016 7:49 PM (GMT-06:00) > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: [llvm-dev] LLVM Pass for Instructions in Function (error > > Hi, > > Please find the embedded code. Also you may follow > http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#iterating-over-the-instruction-in-a-function <http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#iterating-over-the-instruction-in-a-function> > - > Sandeep > > I have following lines in my code, where I need to iterate over the instructions in the function (not BB): > > for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I){ > Instruction *Inst = I; > > Instruction *Inst = &*I; > if (Inst -> getOpcode() == Instruction::GetElementPtr){ > Value* AddrPointer = Inst->getIperand(0); > .... > > if (cast<Operator>(Inst) -> getOpcode() == Instruction::GetElementPtr){ > Value* AddrPointer = cast<Value>(Inst); > Value* threadId = Inst -> getOperand(1); > unsigned AddrSpace = Inst -> getAddressSpace() > DataStructureForTrace.push_back (std:make_tuple(new Value(threadId), AddrSpace, 0, new Value(AddrPointer))); > } > } > > I get following error (there are more, some visible here and some not. for eg, getAddressSpace not being for Instruction class.): > > error: cannot convert ‘llvm::inst_iterator {aka llvm::InstIterator<llvm::SymbolTableList<llvm::BasicBlock>, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<llvm::BasicBlock, false, false, void>, false, false>, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<llvm::Instruction, false, false, void>, false, false>, llvm::Instruction>}’ to ‘llvm::Instruction*’ in initialization > Instruction *Inst = I; > > I am not sure about this, as I am following some online code practices. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Gurunath > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161127/c9a595c3/attachment-0001.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- LLVM Pass for Instructions in Function (error
- llvm/cuda: Indentify kernel functions and optimizations
- LLVM/CLANG: CUDA compilation fail for inline assembly code
- llvm/cuda: Indentify kernel functions and optimizations
- Assign different RegClasses to a virtual, register based on 'uniform' attribute?