Jia Chen via llvm-dev
2016-Mar-23 20:09 UTC
[llvm-dev] [GSoC 2016] Proposal: CFL-AA by default
Dear llvm devs, Based on an earlier discussion about existing pointer analyses in LLVM, I quickly hacked up a GSoC proposal on enabling cfl-aa by default. The decision to write it was made two days before the application deadline, hence the writing quality may not be very satisfactory: the background section could be less verbose, and the implementation section could be more formal. Also it doesn't seem that I am able to come up with a tentative schedule since at this point, I have no idea how long each of the objective is going to take. I've shared my draft through the GSoC website. Any ideas on how I could improve are welcomed. Thanks in advance to everyone who is willing to take his/her time to read it. -- Best Regards, -- Jia Chen
John Criswell via llvm-dev
2016-Mar-25 16:44 UTC
[llvm-dev] [GSoC 2016] Proposal: CFL-AA by default
Dear Jia, I don't see your proposal in the system. What is the title of your proposal, and under what email address did you submit it? Regards, John Criswell On 3/23/16 4:09 PM, Jia Chen via llvm-dev wrote:> Dear llvm devs, > > Based on an earlier discussion about existing pointer analyses in > LLVM, I quickly hacked up a GSoC proposal on enabling cfl-aa by default. > > The decision to write it was made two days before the application > deadline, hence the writing quality may not be very satisfactory: the > background section could be less verbose, and the implementation > section could be more formal. Also it doesn't seem that I am able to > come up with a tentative schedule since at this point, I have no idea > how long each of the objective is going to take. > > I've shared my draft through the GSoC website. Any ideas on how I > could improve are welcomed. Thanks in advance to everyone who is > willing to take his/her time to read it. >-- John Criswell Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/criswell
Jia Chen via llvm-dev
2016-Mar-25 17:08 UTC
[llvm-dev] [GSoC 2016] Proposal: CFL-AA by default
Oops thanks for the reminder. I did use another email address and am terribly sorry for it. Let me just post the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kvepb-v5Ta8ug_lLK1kZeexPNlpvj62K5iIF0fMuLyM/edit?usp=sharing On 03/25/2016 11:44 AM, John Criswell wrote:> Dear Jia, > > I don't see your proposal in the system. What is the title of your > proposal, and under what email address did you submit it? > > Regards, > > John Criswell > > On 3/23/16 4:09 PM, Jia Chen via llvm-dev wrote: >> Dear llvm devs, >> >> Based on an earlier discussion about existing pointer analyses in >> LLVM, I quickly hacked up a GSoC proposal on enabling cfl-aa by default. >> >> The decision to write it was made two days before the application >> deadline, hence the writing quality may not be very satisfactory: the >> background section could be less verbose, and the implementation >> section could be more formal. Also it doesn't seem that I am able to >> come up with a tentative schedule since at this point, I have no idea >> how long each of the objective is going to take. >> >> I've shared my draft through the GSoC website. Any ideas on how I >> could improve are welcomed. Thanks in advance to everyone who is >> willing to take his/her time to read it. >> > >- Jia