search for: tentat

...ation. The conference will be held at the San Jose Hilton. I've updated the webpage with the exact location. During registration (coming very soon!) you will have the opportunity to book a hotel room directly through that process (and get the reduced rate). Now, I'm pleased to announce the tentative agenda for the 2010 LLVM Developers' Meeting: LLDB - Greg Clayton Symbolic Crosschecking of Floating-Point and SIMD Code - Peter Collingboure, Imperial College London The LLVM Assembler & Machine Code Infrastructure - Daniel Dunbar Connecting the EDG front-end to LLVM - Renato Golin,...

Hello LLVMers! Amazingly, it's been 4 months since the release of LLVM 2.8. And so much has changed since then! April will be six months since the previous release, so it's time to start thinking about LLVM 2.9! Here is a tentative schedule for the release (and, of course, our schedules never slip): March 6th - Branch for release. March 7th-14th - Testing Phase 1 March 14th-21st - Preparation for Phase 2 (fixing bugs, merging patches) March 21st-28th - Testing Phase 2 March 28th-April...

On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: >> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? >> > > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is working on it at the moment. -Chris

The six month release time table is coming up soon, which means that it's ready to start planning for the next release! Here is the tentative schedule: October 14th – Create 3.0 Branch October 16th – First Round of Testing Starts October 23rd – First Round of Testing Ends / Bug Fixing Begins October 30th – Second Round of Testing Starts November 6th – Second Round of Testing Ends / Bug Fixing Begins November 13th – Finalization...

On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9?

Hi all, I’m sorry for the late announcement. Here’s a tentative schedule for the 3.5 release. July 21: Branch for 3.5 release. - All features should be near completion. Changes to complete existing features will be accepted until the end of testing phase I. But they should *not* be major (i.e., large) changes. If they are, they may be rejected. July...

Hi LLVM-ites! I wanted to give you a "heads up" on the 3.3 release schedule. Branching [Important] --------------------- We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). Tentative Schedule ------------------ The remaining schedule will follow the normal test - bug fix - repeat process: May 6th - 11th --- Phase I testing May 12th - 18th --- Bug fixing from Phase I May 19th - 25th --- Phase II testing [ Wiggle room for further bug fixing and testing ] June 5th ---...

Looks like this is indeed related to r360841. In C, there are distinctions between declarations, definitions and tentative definitions. Global variables declared with "extern" are declarations. Global variables that don't have "extern" and have initializers are definitions. If global variables have neither "extern" nor initializers, they are called tentative definitions. Common sym...

...is forced to allow > symlinks to dirs. that might not be desirable. Alternatively if they aren't > under a common share root the user can't maintain symlinks as the only > directive available gives permission to create links to anywhere. It's very > crude. >   >   > Tentative ideas for discussion: >   > Replace the current symlink handling directives by directives modelled on valid > /invalid hosts+users: > > valid symlink targets = follow:<mask>, <mask>, <mask> ... [create:] <mask>, > <mask>, <mask>, ......

----- Original Message ---- > From: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > To: Yuri <yuri at rawbw.com> > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Sun, February 20, 2011 3:26:35 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Announcing: LLVM 2.9 Tentative Release Schedule > > > On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > > > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > >> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? > >> > > > > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? > > While it wo...

Hi! I uploaded a tentative patch for the following bug in LV (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34965) but I have some concerns about it. I would appreciate if someone with more experience in SE/PSE can provide some feedback about current tentative fix and alternative solutions described in the comments. Thanks! Dieg...

On Feb 24, 2011, at 4:05 AM, Jan Sjodin wrote: > On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: >> >>> On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: >>>> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? >>>> >>> >>> Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? >> >> While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is working on

Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? Yuri

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > > > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > >> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? > >> > > > > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? > > While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is

> We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). I noticed there is a 3.3 branch in svn, but not in git. Anton, are you still the one managing the git repos? Also, I just added a note to the release info on trunk before noticing we had branched. I was about to port it over, but then noticed that

I will add release branches soon. I just decided to wait a bit in case of some emergency re-creation of branches, etc. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). > > I noticed there is a 3.3 branch in svn, but not in git.

Please visit our family photo albums at http://www.photos.vanpeters.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080306/9c42cd2b/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 1524 bytes Desc: not

...t it might be used by a regular obj? I.e. in BitcodeCompiler::add. Teresa On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 5:48 AM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com<mailto:ruiu at google.com>> wrote: Looks like this is indeed related to r360841. In C, there are distinctions between declarations, definitions and tentative definitions. Global variables declared with "extern" are declarations. Global variables that don't have "extern" and have initializers are definitions. If global variables have neither "extern" nor initializers, they are called tentative definitions. Common sym...

The tentative date for the next Cambridge LLVM Social is Wed 22nd October, 7:30pm at the Cambridge Blue. http://www.the-cambridgeblue.co.uk/blueroadmap.html If you haven't done so yet, you can subscribe to our calendar to know when the next one will be: https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=as5fh06...

Hi all, Just wanted to give a quick update on the plan for the 3.6 release. I had hoped to have at least posted a schedule by now, but I also don't want us to have two releases in flight at the same time, so the plan is to wait until 3.5.1 is done. My tentative plan is to branch early January. Please let me know what you think. Cheers, Hans