George Rimar via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-15 23:16 UTC
[llvm-dev] HA: LLD benchmark results for all commits
>Here is the result. This table contains a commit message, a SVN revision >number, time to link, size of the resulting Clang binary in each row.That really looks awesome. And "graph hides some part of the table" is also true for me. But anyways looks really cool, thanks for that ! Best regards, George.
Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-15 23:23 UTC
[llvm-dev] LLD benchmark results for all commits
I created room above the first line so they don't overlap. This is probably better than moving the graph to another sheet because I think if I do, some of you do not notice that there's a graph at all. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:16 PM, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote:> >Here is the result. This table contains a commit message, a SVN revision > >number, time to link, size of the resulting Clang binary in each row. > > That really looks awesome. And "graph hides some part of the table" is > also true for me. > But anyways looks really cool, thanks for that ! > > Best regards, > George. > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160115/9983f15e/attachment.html>
George Rimar via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-15 23:26 UTC
[llvm-dev] HA: LLD benchmark results for all commits
>I created room above the first line so they don't overlap. This is probably better than moving the graph to another sheet because I think if I do, some of you do not notice that there's a graph at all.Ok, I also can`t understand where linker is going slower in table ? "C" column which is "Link time (seconds)" is lower and lower. Does it supposed to be inverted (1 - X) ? Best regards, George.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- HA: LLD benchmark results for all commits
- HA: LLD benchmark results for all commits
- [RFC] - Deduplication of debug information in linkers (LLD).
- [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
- Should we switch to --hash-style=both by default in LLD ?