search for: r_aarch64_ldst128_abs_lo12_nc

...t decrease to any single change. That's the result of accumulation, and that's why I wrote it tends to getting slower. All the accumulation was offset by a single change, which is the string table optimization patch, though. Ok. There are few wierds also. 257731 "[ELF/AArch64] Support R_AARCH64_LDST128_ABS_LO12_NC relocation." looks to have 0.425998862 link time what is greater than previous 0.415870616. I dont think its because of this lld changes. So i guess other llvm code also affects. Best regards, George.

>I created room above the first line so they don't overlap. This is probably better than moving the graph to another sheet because I think if I do, some of you do not notice that there's a graph at all. Ok, I also can`t understand where linker is going slower in table ? "C" column which is "Link time (seconds)" is lower and lower. Does it supposed to be inverted (1