Gundapaneni, Sumanth
2014-Dec-16 20:12 UTC
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
The point here is, if you are not building for Android.
You will hit this patch with cmake configuration
-DCOMPILER_RT_TEST_TRIPLE=aarch64-linux-gnu
+ elseif("${COMPILER_RT_TEST_TARGET_ARCH}" MATCHES
"aarch64")
+ test_target_arch(aarch64 "-march=aarch64")
I don't see "-march=aarch64" is a valid flag on either LLVM or
GCC.
Should we replace this with a flag which is valid for only aarch64 and works for
both LLVM and GCC ?
If the compiler-rt build works for others, I would like to see their cmake
recipe ?
--Sumanth G
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Northover [mailto:t.p.northover at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:02 AM
To: Christophe Lyon
Cc: Renato Golin; Gundapaneni, Sumanth; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; Kostya
Serebryany
Subject: Re: [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
> Not sure what r181130 is supposed to do, though, since it introduces a
> buggy option.
I didn't even have compiler-rt checked out when I was doing that; I was just
trying to get the base check-all working. As I recall that option filtered
through to some llvm-lit config files. Though it might have been a .inc header.
Cheers.
Tim.
Christophe Lyon
2014-Dec-16 20:29 UTC
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
On 16 December 2014 at 21:12, Gundapaneni, Sumanth <sgundapa at quicinc.com> wrote:> The point here is, if you are not building for Android. > You will hit this patch with cmake configuration -DCOMPILER_RT_TEST_TRIPLE=aarch64-linux-gnu > > + elseif("${COMPILER_RT_TEST_TARGET_ARCH}" MATCHES "aarch64") > + test_target_arch(aarch64 "-march=aarch64") > > I don't see "-march=aarch64" is a valid flag on either LLVM or GCC. > Should we replace this with a flag which is valid for only aarch64 and works for both LLVM and GCC ?I think it should be -march=armv8-a> > If the compiler-rt build works for others, I would like to see their cmake recipe ? > > --Sumanth G > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Northover [mailto:t.p.northover at gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:02 AM > To: Christophe Lyon > Cc: Renato Golin; Gundapaneni, Sumanth; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; Kostya Serebryany > Subject: Re: [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang > >> Not sure what r181130 is supposed to do, though, since it introduces a >> buggy option. > > I didn't even have compiler-rt checked out when I was doing that; I was just trying to get the base check-all working. As I recall that option filtered through to some llvm-lit config files. Though it might have been a .inc header. > > Cheers. > > Tim.
Renato Golin
2014-Dec-16 20:33 UTC
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
On 16 December 2014 at 20:29, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon at linaro.org> wrote:>> I don't see "-march=aarch64" is a valid flag on either LLVM or GCC. >> Should we replace this with a flag which is valid for only aarch64 and works for both LLVM and GCC ? > > I think it should be -march=armv8-aSorry folks, that was totally my fault and I was too busy to realise it. I have just changed it to "armv8-a" on r224362. I'm building it now and it's working. cheers, --renato
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
- [LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
- [LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
- [LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
- [LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang