Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r224362".
2014 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
...Should we replace this with a flag which is valid for only aarch64 and
> works for both LLVM and GCC ?
> >
> > I think it should be -march=armv8-a
>
> Sorry folks, that was totally my fault and I was too busy to realise
> it. I have just changed it to "armv8-a" on r224362. I'm building it
> now and it's working.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
--------...
2014 Dec 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
On 16 December 2014 at 21:12, Gundapaneni, Sumanth <sgundapa at quicinc.com> wrote:
> The point here is, if you are not building for Android.
> You will hit this patch with cmake configuration -DCOMPILER_RT_TEST_TRIPLE=aarch64-linux-gnu
>
> + elseif("${COMPILER_RT_TEST_TARGET_ARCH}" MATCHES "aarch64")
> + test_target_arch(aarch64
2014 Dec 18
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
...> and
> >> >> works for both LLVM and GCC ?
> >> >
> >> > I think it should be -march=armv8-a
> >>
> >> Sorry folks, that was totally my fault and I was too busy to realise
> >> it. I have just changed it to "armv8-a" on r224362. I'm building it
> >> now and it's working.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> --renato
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>...
2014 Dec 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
The point here is, if you are not building for Android.
You will hit this patch with cmake configuration -DCOMPILER_RT_TEST_TRIPLE=aarch64-linux-gnu
+ elseif("${COMPILER_RT_TEST_TARGET_ARCH}" MATCHES "aarch64")
+ test_target_arch(aarch64 "-march=aarch64")
I don't see "-march=aarch64" is a valid flag on either LLVM or GCC.
Should we replace this