Tim Northover
2013-Nov-26 19:00 UTC
[LLVMdev] Targeting ARM Cortex-a9 from x86_64 with clang
On 26 November 2013 18:46, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:> Here's where we left off: > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-February/059099.htmlBack then you mentioned a Chromium build, are you still running that routinely with -integrated-as? That would give a reasonable reassurance about general-usage, if not weird features. Cheers. Tim.
Greg Fitzgerald
2013-Nov-26 19:20 UTC
[LLVMdev] Targeting ARM Cortex-a9 from x86_64 with clang
> Back then you mentioned a Chromium build, are you still running that > routinely with -integrated-as?Yes. It works perfectly for a C/C++ code. There have been a few hiccups with inline assembly (missing aliases, switching ARM modes) and we sometimes disable it explicitly for those. It's very possible that we can use -integrated-as for most of those now too, but I haven't tried. It's nice to still have that -no-integrated-as escape hatch. -Greg On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:> On 26 November 2013 18:46, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: >> Here's where we left off: >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-February/059099.html > > Back then you mentioned a Chromium build, are you still running that > routinely with -integrated-as? That would give a reasonable > reassurance about general-usage, if not weird features. > > Cheers. > > Tim.
Renato Golin
2013-Nov-26 22:45 UTC
[LLVMdev] Targeting ARM Cortex-a9 from x86_64 with clang
On 26 November 2013 19:20, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:> It's nice to still have that -no-integrated-as escape hatch. >>From all I hear, I think having that would be the best course of actionpost-3.4 release. cheers, -renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131126/6f2417b0/attachment.html>