search for: timefram

Hello all, I've a question regarding the values "completed" and "abandoned" that are returned by the manager command "queuestatus". What is the timeframe for these values, are they counted since the last asterisk boot, or per day, or is the timeframe configurable? Thanks and Regards Markus

Hi all, I want to execute a loop of a program: for (u in Timeframemin:Timeframe){} Imagine that Timeframemin<-10 Timefram<-10000 Is it posible to execute the loop but only proving from 10 to 10000 but jumping 10 each time, for example, execute for 10,20,30.....to Timeframe. Other question is, when a program is "heavy" and has a lot of loops to...

...number in it that I would modify, or do you just mean the file names? Sincerely, Rob Groner From: Charles Lepple [mailto:clepple at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 9:23 AM To: Rob Groner Cc: nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: Re: [Nut-upsdev] New sub-driver submission process timeframe? On Mar 9, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com<mailto:rgroner at RTD.com>> wrote: I don't have any problem with pointing customers to a branch they can clone via git and compile. I know this sounds pedantic, but while the snapshots correspond to specific branches a...

I see it's been in the wishlist a while. Any possible timeframe for getting it working, or maybe a patch (or is it too big a change) to support it? I'm building a new server to move an existing userbase to. So far I have working: Postfix (with Maildir quota patches that work fine) Amavis-new with ClamAV scanning for viruses (will add SpamAssassin soon...

On Mar 9, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com> wrote: > Is there a specific file with the version number in it that I would modify, or do you just mean the file names? The canonical place is in configure.ac, and everything else gets regenerated if you rerun autogren.sh That script, by the way, calls "autoreconf -i" which includes the --add-missing flag that I

...o...no luck. Sincerely, Rob Groner > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Lepple [mailto:clepple at gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 1:04 PM > To: Rob Groner > Cc: nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org > Subject: Re: [Nut-upsdev] New sub-driver submission process timeframe? > > > On Mar 9, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com> wrote: > > > Is there a specific file with the version number in it that I would modify, or > do you just mean the file names? > > The canonical place is in configure.ac, and everything else get...

...calculations over time, For that every data set is split into junks based on the time stamps so one data set has like 10 timestamps. There is also the case that one data set has less than 10 timestamps. In my code I was doing the following lapply(Datasource,analysis_for_one_data_source) lapply(TimeFrames,analysis_for_one_data_source_and_one_time_frame) as you can imagine there are times where the second lapply will "explode" analysis_for_one_data_source_and_one_time_frame<- function( DataSource, TimeFrame,) {         return( do_analysis(DataSource,TimeFrame))         } as you c...

On Mar 9, 2015, at 9:09 AM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com> wrote: > I don?t have any problem with pointing customers to a branch they can clone via git and compile. I know this sounds pedantic, but while the snapshots correspond to specific branches and commits in git, they are simpler for end users to build than the git branches, since they include the ./configure script and a few

Hello, I am trying to come up with a way to have individual quotas per user for the submission service. Similar to what I could achieve with Postfix and policyd. More specifically, the quota I am most interested in, is limiting the number of messages a single account can send within a given timeframe. Ideally, I'd also like to limit the number of total recipients within a given timeframe, to mitigate the loophole of adding multiple recipients to a single message. Example: account Y is allowed to send 500 messages per 60 minutes, with a maximum of 2000 recipients overall. What would be th...

Hi, I have the following data frame, where col2 is a startdate and col3 an enddate COL1 COL2 COL3 A 40462 40482 B 40462 40478 The above timeframe of 3 weeks I would like to splits it in weeks like this COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4 A 40462 40468 1 A 40469 40475 1 A 40476 40482 1 B 40462 40468 1 B 40469 40475 1 B 40476 40478...

greetings i used to use slackware years ago. i would still use it in conjunction with CentOS etc if i had more time and extra financial resources. thing is, years ago i used to subscribe to reminder emails from packages like Apache httpd etc and they would tickle me when new releases or betas were available. i still get emails from them... anyways, the question i am wondering is... when a

Can anyone with a well-connected crystal ball suggest a timeframe for an IA64 release of CentOS 5? Weeks? Months? Never? Thanks Nigel Kendrick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090305/9e37ac3a/attachment-0004.html>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, is there any time frame foreseeable for KB providing an update for httpd? Upstream provided their SRPM yesterday, i.e. Aug 31 19:40. [0] [1] It builds flawless on several machines I tried (Scientific Linux 6, CentOS 5 and 6). Question is: Should one deploy a self-build RPM or will there be an update in the next... "time"? (Given

...o CalDAV calendar cal1, request REPORT to /calendar/dav/info at mydomain.tld/events/: Could not authenticate to server: rejected Basic challenge [cal1] type = caldav url = https://www.google.com/calendar/dav/info at mydomain.tld/events/ user = info at mydomain.tld secret = mysecret refresh = 15 timeframe = 60 When I go to the URL https://www.google.com/calendar/dav/info at mydomain.tld/events/ I can log in with the credentials to the calendar (and get a download window for the calendar file). So it seems not a problem of authentication to me. But what then could be the real issue here ?...

I want to create a data.frame of time and date for a year. I started with the idea of simply producing two vectors (time and date) The first part ( time) is easy. rep(1:24, 365) But how do I get a series of 24 dates for O1 January 2005 and repeat this to 31 December 2005. It should be easy but I don't see it. Thanks

...or at least available for checkout. Thanks for the thorough response! Sincerely, Rob Groner From: Charles Lepple [mailto:clepple at gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2015 9:36 AM To: Rob Groner Cc: nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: Re: [Nut-upsdev] New sub-driver submission process timeframe? On Mar 6, 2015, at 4:40 PM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com<mailto:rgroner at RTD.com>> wrote: So, if I write my own subdriver for our UPS...how quickly can I expect that it will be incorporated in some downloadable version of nut that a user can then use? I'm struggling a bit...

I''m evaluating what to use for integration testing: SafariWatir - integrates nicely with RSpec - doesn''t work with Ajax because of Safari event firing issues Selenium - Works with Ajax - doesn''t integrate with RSpec What is the best guess timeframe for RSpec integration testing? Will it be able to test Ajax application in the early iterations? Thanks, Brian Yamabe

...input what it should look like. One possibility is: Syslinux 4 - Filesystems in C, COM32R, basic interfaces to support Gfxboot as COM16. Syslinux 5 - ELF linker, native TCP for PXELINUX, no COM16 support. Syslinux 6 (or 5.something) - EFI support. I'd like to get people's feel for the timeframes they care about these features for... -hpa

...won't break big things. > > > Yeah. I’d like to hear about regarding Chrome’s dependencies as well; we > don’t want to break them. As discussed in a bunch of different places, Chrome should be fine here. You'll note that I replied directly to Ted's post asking whether the timeframe would be reasonable or what would be reasonable, and will naturally be waiting to hear back from him before anything happens. =] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131031/cc1060cb/attachment.htm...

...> We discussed this a while back, back then you did not have the time to > compare your rsync setup. > > It is still required if you do not want to run sysvolreset after each > rsync of the sysvol folders If the mappings in idmap.tdb are not the same there will always be an small timeframe with incorrect access rights on sysvol. If an clients connects in this timeframe it may not have access to gpo's and scripts. Or even worse an attacker may have unwanted access rights on the sysvol share.