Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "__s_atime".
2013 Oct 16
3
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
...specialization
'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock,
std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >
>::time_point<std::chrono::duration<long,
std::ratio<1, 1000000000> > >' requested here
const __clock_t::time_point __s_atime = __s_entry + __delta;
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:234:12:
note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from
'duration<[...], ratio<[...], 1000000000>>' to 'const...
2013 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
...'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock,
> std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >
> >::time_point<std::chrono::duration<long,
> std::ratio<1, 1000000000> > >' requested here
> const __clock_t::time_point __s_atime = __s_entry + __delta;
> ^
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:234:12:
> note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from
> 'duration<[...], ratio<[...], 1000000000>>...
2013 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
On 15/10/13 22:22, C K Kashyap wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am
> running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both
> cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++.
> I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a
> Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for
2013 Oct 15
2
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
Hi,
I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am
running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both
cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++.
I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a
Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for exploring clang.
I was able to successfully build clang on my ubuntu but