jingu kang
2013-May-28 15:18 UTC
[LLVMdev] Error on VSELECT Dagcombiner with some architecture
Hi all, I met the error while compiling the code with vector type with some architecture. IR is as following. %cmp = icmp sgt <3 x i8> %x, zeroinitializer %sub = sub <3 x i8> zeroinitializer, %x %cond = select <3 x i1> %cmp, <3 x i8> %x, <3 x i8> %sub 'select' IR is converted to 'vselect' dag and is combined to 'sra (X, size(X)-1); xor (add (X, Y), Y)'. There is a problem here. If the target support i8 type as promote integer to make size(X), size(X) has i32 type. and then type legalize pass do widening the vector like this. v4i8 = BUILD_VECTOR 0x99d90a8: i32 = Constant<7> [ID=-3], 0x99d90a8: i32 = Constant<7> [ID=-3], 0x99d90a8: i32 = Constant<7> [ID=-3], 0x9a6c6c8: i8 = undef In the end, type legalizer generates a error like this "Operands must all have the same type"'. I tested this code with ARM and MIPS. Target specific dag combiner functions runs after default dag combiner functions so I feel it's not possible to support target specific dag combiner function of vselect to fix this problem. Should I check the sra? What do you think about this? In order to remove this error, I just removed the vselect dag combiner function. Thanks, JinGu Kang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130528/f75f9cce/attachment.html>
Duncan Sands
2013-May-28 15:50 UTC
[LLVMdev] Error on VSELECT Dagcombiner with some architecture
Hi JinGu Kang, On 28/05/13 17:18, jingu kang wrote:> Hi all, > > I met the error while compiling the code with vector type with some > architecture. IR is as following. > > %cmp = icmp sgt <3 x i8> %x, zeroinitializer > %sub = sub <3 x i8> zeroinitializer, %x > %cond = select <3 x i1> %cmp, <3 x i8> %x, <3 x i8> %sub > > 'select' IR is converted to 'vselect' dag and is combined to 'sra (X, > size(X)-1); xor (add (X, Y), Y)'. There is a problem here. If the target support > i8 type as promote integer to make size(X), size(X) has i32 type. and then type > legalize pass do widening the vector like this. > > v4i8 = BUILD_VECTOR 0x99d90a8: i32 = Constant<7> [ID=-3], 0x99d90a8: i32 > Constant<7> [ID=-3], 0x99d90a8: i32 = Constant<7> [ID=-3], 0x9a6c6c8: i8 = undefthis BUILD_VECTOR is invalid (the last element should be i32 = undef). Please open a bugreport with a testcase that allows people to reproduce this. Best wishes, Duncan.> > In the end, type legalizer generates a error like this "Operands must all have > the same type"'. I tested this code with ARM and MIPS. > > Target specific dag combiner functions runs after default dag combiner functions > so I feel it's not possible to support target specific dag combiner function of > vselect to fix this problem. Should I check the sra? What do you think about > this? In order to remove this error, I just removed the vselect dag combiner > function. > > Thanks, > JinGu Kang > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
jingu kang
2013-May-28 16:17 UTC
[LLVMdev] Error on VSELECT Dagcombiner with some architecture
Hi Duncan, I appreciate your comment. I opened the bug report to bugzilla of llvm. Thanks, JinGu Kang 2013/5/28 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>> Hi JinGu Kang, > > > On 28/05/13 17:18, jingu kang wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I met the error while compiling the code with vector type with some >> architecture. IR is as following. >> >> %cmp = icmp sgt <3 x i8> %x, zeroinitializer >> %sub = sub <3 x i8> zeroinitializer, %x >> %cond = select <3 x i1> %cmp, <3 x i8> %x, <3 x i8> %sub >> >> 'select' IR is converted to 'vselect' dag and is combined to 'sra (X, >> size(X)-1); xor (add (X, Y), Y)'. There is a problem here. If the target >> support >> i8 type as promote integer to make size(X), size(X) has i32 type. and >> then type >> legalize pass do widening the vector like this. >> >> v4i8 = BUILD_VECTOR 0x99d90a8: i32 = Constant<7> [ID=-3], 0x99d90a8: >> i32 >> Constant<7> [ID=-3], 0x99d90a8: i32 = Constant<7> [ID=-3], 0x9a6c6c8: i8 >> = undef >> > > this BUILD_VECTOR is invalid (the last element should be i32 = undef). > Please > open a bugreport with a testcase that allows people to reproduce this. > > Best wishes, Duncan. > > > >> In the end, type legalizer generates a error like this "Operands must all >> have >> the same type"'. I tested this code with ARM and MIPS. >> >> Target specific dag combiner functions runs after default dag combiner >> functions >> so I feel it's not possible to support target specific dag combiner >> function of >> vselect to fix this problem. Should I check the sra? What do you think >> about >> this? In order to remove this error, I just removed the vselect dag >> combiner >> function. >> >> Thanks, >> JinGu Kang >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/**mailman/listinfo/llvmdev<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev> >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/**mailman/listinfo/llvmdev<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130528/35cfd6ef/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] Error on VSELECT Dagcombiner with some architecture
- [LLVMdev] Bug in visitSIGN_EXTEND in DAGCombiner.cpp?
- [LLVMdev] Bug in visitSIGN_EXTEND in DAGCombiner.cpp?
- [LLVMdev] Bug in visitSIGN_EXTEND in DAGCombiner.cpp?
- [LLVMdev] Bug in visitSIGN_EXTEND in DAGCombiner.cpp?